- Since weak oil demand growth is a major ingredient in the current oil price crash, higher demand stimulated by low prices could be a moderating factor.
- While US demand has risen since prices fell, there are several reasons why the global response may be slower to appear and less dramatic.
One of the main factors that will determine the depth and duration of the current slump in oil prices is the extent and timing of a resulting rebound in demand. It is likely to occur first in countries like the US, where fuel taxes are low and consumers see the results of lower oil prices at the gas pump relatively quickly–a $1.65 per gallon drop already, since June. However, other factors besides taxes could impede faster demand growth elsewhere.
From 2007 to 2009 the combination of high oil prices and a weak economy reduced US petroleum demand by almost 2 million barrels (bbl) per day, compared to its 2006 peak. The first volumes backed out of the market were imported refined products, which had grown rapidly from the mid-1990s until 2005. Low domestic demand and expanding US oil production then led US oil refiners to seek new markets, particularly in Latin America. US petroleum product exports have increased by around 1.7 million bbl/day since the recession began.
These refiners might reasonably expect their domestic and foreign markets to grow faster with oil prices dramatically lower. So far, it’s hard to see more than hints of this in the lagged data from the US government or API, which reported December gasoline demand at a 7-year high. It’s also hard to discern how much can be attributed to oil prices, rather than to US economic growth and a falling unemployment rate. The October update of vehicle miles traveled from the US Department of Transportation was still well below its 2008 peak but showed a modest upward trend, although that seems to have begun before oil prices fell.
Other indicators are also mixed. By the end of last year sales-weighted fuel economy of new vehicles sold in the US had declined by 0.7 miles per gallon from its August 2014 peak. That reflected US consumers buying larger vehicles, including more SUVs, fewer hybrids and only slightly more plug-in electric cars than in the prior year. Despite this retreat, full-year-average fuel economy tracked by the University of Michigan still showed a more than 5 mpg gain since 2007, equating to 20% better fuel efficiency. So the roughly 45 million cars and light trucks sold in the US in the last three years–nearly a fifth of today’s light-duty fleet–will use less gasoline than the ones they replaced, even in the most robust response to low gas prices imaginable.
Globally, growth prospects seem equally mixed. Since last July the International Energy Agency has reduced its forecast of 2015 petroleum demand growth by a cumulative 500,000 bbl/day, to +0.9 million bbl/day, as the global economy weakened. These conditions could combine with currency-related effects to dampen, or at least delay, a potential surge in global oil demand due to low prices.
Since petroleum products are sold in local currency, after tax at the pump, consumers in many countries have seen a smaller drop to which they might respond, compared to US consumers. The average German gasoline price has fallen by just 19% since June and the average UK price by 20%, compared to 42% in the US. Meanwhile state-controlled gasoline prices in Brazil and Mexico have gone up. That’s unlikely to induce more driving.
So far the weekly figures for US refinery throughput are up compared to last year, implying higher expected product sales. However, US inventories of gasoline and diesel fuel have also been growing for the last several months. If rising demand doesn’t erode inventory gains soon, refiners may need to reduce processing rates, and that would feed back to oil prices. The next few months of energy statistics should tell a very interesting story.


Plantagenet on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 9:49 am
The oil glut could go on for quite a while if rising demand doesn’t kick in to soak up excess supply
MSN Fanboy on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 9:56 am
Plant, if that scenario plays out its game over. Shortonoil will be proved to be correct.
Lets hope your both wrong, at least for now.
GregT on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 9:57 am
The oil glut could go on indefinitely if our economies cannot afford the oil.
Northwest Resident on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 10:17 am
Now that the average barrel of oil is getting to the point where there is very little economic benefit to burning it, it is a guarantee that the amount of oil extracted will eventually fall to meet dwindling demand. For now, there are still a lot of oil producers pumping and fracking as fast as they can because they have little to no choice. Not many, if any of those producers will make it past the end of this year is my guess. When they go, so will the “glut”.
Plantagenet on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 10:46 am
@nordent
Hahahaha
Your claim that “that there is little economic benefit” to burning oil is howler!
What next? Will you claim there is little nutritional benefit from eating food?
HAHAHAHAHA!
Cheers!
Perk Earl on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 10:54 am
“So far the weekly figures for US refinery throughput are up compared to last year, implying higher expected product sales. However, US inventories of gasoline and diesel fuel have also been growing for the last several months. If rising demand doesn’t erode inventory gains soon, refiners may need to reduce processing rates, and that would feed back to oil prices.”
Hmm, some mixed signals there. Also oil price is up from it’s recent low – about 5 bucks on Brent, from 48+ to 53+.
Northwest Resident on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 11:09 am
Panter — Insane laughter is what we expect coming from you. That, and insults and false accusations and distortions.
Decreasing economic benefit to burning oil is a fact. The less energy there is in a barrel of oil, the less the benefit of burning that oil. How could you possibly dispute that.
We are approaching a point in time where there is “NO” economic benefit to burning oil.
You, Panter, are the actual “howler”.
Plantagenet on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 11:13 am
Oil prices are because the Caliphate is attacking in Iraq’s oil regions again, not because the oil glut is ending.
In fact, US oil inventories going up is evidence the oil glut is continuing.
Plantagenet on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 11:14 am
Oil prices are up because the Caliphate is attacking in Iraq’s oil regions again, not because the oil glut is ending.
In fact, US oil inventories going up is evidence the oil glut is continuing.
Northwest Resident on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 12:23 pm
“Global political tensions are high and will be rising as oil revenues in exporting countries collapse. Analysts speak of a “break even” price for oil across various nations including social costs. What they don’t seem to realize is that absent a universal suppliers’ cartel (which OPEC clearly is not, because its members are autonomous, and many of the largest producers, including Norway, Russia, and US are not even members), high social break even prices incentivize individual producers to pump more, not less, oil at low prices! Frankly, one need not apply any “game theory” or strategic analysis to oil price determination; the massive size, fragmentation, and liquidity of the oil markets makes it a perfect study in competitively determined equilibrium pricing.”
“Drillers Are In Denial” Brynjolfsson Warns Crude Bounce Is “One More Head-Fake”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-02/drillers-are-denial-brynjolfsson-warns-crude-bounce-one-more-head-fake
shortonoil on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 12:42 pm
The largest consumer of the energy provided from oil is now the oil industry. As production declines from lower prices demand will fall with it. This will happen as the producers themselves curtail usage. A significant portion of the industry can no longer continue to operate at present prices levels, and prices can not recover significantly enough to bring them back to a profitable level.
http://www.thehillsgroup.org/depletion2_022.htm
The petroleum industry is now in a downward spiral from which there is no escape. This is the inevitable conclusion of a depletion event. The oil age will end when it is no longer economically viable to produce petroleum. Only a portion of the world’s petroleum resource was ever usable, and the greater majority of that has already been removed. What remains is the least valuable of the initial reserve.
Oil has been the primary driver of economic growth for the last century, and because growth is a necessary, and essential component of the present economy system, its decline will have far reaching implications. Without growth many of the institutions that we have become almost totally dependent upon will fail. Almost every facet of modern society will be adversely affected. A good time to take stock of our situation, and begin changing how we do things would be now!
http://www.thehillsgroup.org/
GregT on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 12:58 pm
Thank you Short,
Your comment above should be in bold, red flashing letters. There will always be some ‘plants’ left however, no matter how easy things should be to comprehend, they will never have the capacity to be able to think logically. Sometimes I think that we are dealing with a vegetable, rather than a plant.
Northwest Resident on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 1:14 pm
I second Greg’s thanks to shortonoil.
Just one comment. It is true that economic growth is a necessary and essential component of the present economic system. In fact, growth is vital, because without growth debts don’t get paid. That’s because credit is another vital component of our economic system — credit is granted, that money is used to grow market share and therefore the economy, producing a profit, which enables paying off the old loan and clearing the balance sheet to take on a new loan for the next round of profits/growth.
Without growth, the whole system breaks down. Who will lend money if they don’t have confidence in getting paid back? If the credit and loans stop, so does the economy.
For some years, probably at least since 2008 (or so), there has been very little “real” economic growth. Any growth that we have seen has been due to massive injections of QE liquidity — more loans. Except this time, those loans are not going to be paid back. Economic growth today is a joke, it is an illusion, it is flat out faked numbers. All of which has worked for a little while, and that’s probably all it was ever intended to do — to buy a little more time before reality sets in and the lights go out.
We are entering that final stage now. Better face the facts.
Davy on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 1:20 pm
Greg/NR, I copied Shorts comment to an email for my brother. I rarely send him such news but short was short and too the point. That is precisely what a busy CEO needs. IMA my baby brother with a big wallet…or soon to be a smaller emptied big wallet.
Northwest Resident on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 1:38 pm
Davy — Please let us know what your CEO brother’s response is, if any. My guess is that his whole world reality is built on the assumption of constant economic growth, which by default means a constantly growing supply of oil. Such a feeble foundation for any “reality” to be built on!! We know that, but does your brother? Inquiring minds want to know!
Davy on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 1:49 pm
NR, I have been hammering on him now for 10 years. He is listening but has to play the game. His peer group has tight behavioral rules. Back when I was with that crowd 11 years ago they shunned me as being not quite right. I agree with that determination but not per their reasoning. Some people dance to a different tune.
Joe Clarkson on Mon, 2nd Feb 2015 7:50 pm
shortonoil says The largest consumer of the energy provided from oil is now the oil industry.
Amazing, but only if true. This statement is equal to saying that the EROI of oil production is less than 2:1. Or maybe he meant the ‘single largest consumer’, meaning that the oil industry uses more energy than any other single sector of the economy. But the plain meaning of the statement is that the oil industry uses the majority of energy from oil.
Crude refining energy efficiency is roughly 90%, so right away I’ll accept that 10% of crude oil energy is used in the refining process (even though refineries get some energy from other sources). But I find it hard to believe that the E&P,transportation and distribution parts of the oil industry use the minimum 44% of the output of those refineries needed to make short’s statement true. Really!?
Let’s see some data, shortonoil. Bold claims need solid evidence.