Page added on December 9, 2014
That the world is an evil place seems self-evident to many people. They demonstrate it by simply pointing to the latest headlines of war, crime, disaster, racism, and worsening test scores. Pundits warn us ominously that America is running higeldy pigeldy down the road to Hell.
But is this negative perception, fueled by endless news accounts of horrible things, an accurate one? Is life barely more than miserable? Let’s consider.
Back in the mid-1990s an article appeared in Scientific American on the issue of happiness. According to the article, at any given moment, 93 percent of the world’s human beings feel happy about their lives as a whole. These percentages of happiness remained constant regardless of income, education, or the place individuals happened to live.
If things are as bad as everyone suggests, then how could this be? But think about your own life. Are you planning on slitting your wrists as soon as you finish reading this article? Probably not. Chances are, you’re pretty comfortable and generally content just now. Think you’re unique? Think again.
The world’s population stands at about 7 billion. Many think this is a bad thing and moan endlessly about the population explosion. But stop and ask a simple question: why are there so many people? Was sex really invented in the 60s? Have birth rates skyrocketed? Not at all. Birthrates are actually declining. So the question remains: why so many human beings?
Because not so many people are dying!
Human life expectancy in 1800 was 40, while the world population was only about 900 million. Infant mortality was rampant. Disease proliferated. Starvation was common. Since then, life expectancy has nearly doubled, and the population has skyrocketed as a consequence. According to CIA statistics recorded in the CIA World Factbook, less than 0.9 percent of the world population died last year. That’s less than one percent. That’s from all causes. Or to put it another way, a bit more than 99.1 percent of the human race didn’t go to their graves last year.
So let’s consider some obvious implications.
The number of people who have died this year because of crime? Less than one percent of the human race.
The number of people who have died because of natural disasters? Less than one percent.
The number of people who have died because of terrorism? Less than one percent.
The number of people who have died because of starvation? Less than one percent.
The number of people who have died because of diseases? Less than one percent.
The number of people who died as a consequence of war? Less than one percent.
In fact, Steven Pinker in his book The Better Angels of Our Natures indicates that out of all the deaths in the world, only about 2 percent of them are caused by war or some other sort of violence. Statistics like those would seem to demonstrate that the world’s not quite so awful as the nightly news would like us to believe. (Stopping to consider the last time one heard of a life insurance company going bankrupt might be another bit of evidence.)
Certainly there is suffering and evil and doubtless the headlines on today’s paper are filled with ugly information. But the real reason the news is almost always bad is because bad is unusual and newspapers and television are interested in novelty.
Consider: do the newspapers or television report on the millions and millions of people who went to work today, did their jobs, came home, kissed their spouses and children and had a quiet evening? Of course not. That would be boring. Instead, they’ll report on the single whacko who went to his job and machine-gunned all his coworkers. Now that’s interesting.
Humanity is warlike and violent, right? Then why, according to the CIA, is only two percent of the world’s gross economic production devoted to defense spending? That means that ninety-eight percent of what the world spends its money on each year is for stuff other than making guns and bombers.
For much of human history, human beings spent a lot of time concerned about having enough food to eat. Famines were common. People regularly worried about whether they’d be able to eat today. Now, the biggest health concern in the United States is obesity. We have so much food that we have to spend gobs of cash on fancy ways to lose the extra weight it puts on our bodies. In fact, in general, the fattest people in the United States are also among the poorest.
In 1804 the former Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton was shot to death in a duel with the Vice President of the United States, Aaron Burr. In the twenty-first century, commentators become apoplectic when the Vice President says a bad word to a political opponent. They bemoan the loss of civility in political dialogue. I don’t know about you, but if the worst thing a politician does now is call his opponents “girly men” or some such thing, we have little to complain about.
Hard as I try, I have difficulty thinking that this is the worst of all possible worlds, or that the world is getting worse and worse. Quite the opposite. Take a break from the nightly news. Go outside, notice the blue sky and green grass. Take a deep breath. Relax. Put things in perspective. Then smile.
5 Comments on "The worst possible world?"
Davy on Tue, 9th Dec 2014 6:28 am
Yea, I would say take a break and smell the roses while you can. This guy is in utter denial and demonstrative of the very real dangers MSM cornucopian propaganda poses. We have scientific evidence in multiple disciplines of problems and predicaments. The denial and delusions of continuous growth fantasies puts us at profound risks.
At some point when it is too late and it may be, then, I guess allowing the delusion and denial to dominate will keep control of a panic response. Yet, we may have time to adjust and mitigate the coming descent. We still have a chance for a major crisis to change attitudes and lifestyles that ae destructive and wasteful. Once we get on this train of descent there is no turning back. Complexity will be disrupted leaving our complex global in decay affecting each and every local in random and unforeseen ways.
This article may or may not be good considering this condition we are facing. Is denial good or bad when panic is considered? Can people handle the truth? Do we have time to mitigate or not? Should we ever give up trying to adjust and mitigate? Bau is a dead man walking but the question is do we march blindly to the abyss or can we climb down that cliff?
ghung on Tue, 9th Dec 2014 10:07 am
Maybe they better ask the Planet how it feels about all of this. Oh, wait! It doesn’t ‘feel’ a thing. Nature has permitted humans to self-select themselves for extinction with zero regard for how we feel about it, just as it always has for any species that outgrows its resource base and fouls its collective nest. That we, humans, are better at this than other species, or that we may have had a choice, means little in geological time. We’ll simply be re-absorbed into the matrix like every other species whose time has come and gone. Extinction level events are the equal-opportunity destroyers, regardless of cause.
Davy on Tue, 9th Dec 2014 10:20 am
G, natures yin and yang is extinction and evolution.
Dredd on Tue, 9th Dec 2014 10:24 am
“Hard as I try, I have difficulty thinking that this is the worst of all possible worlds, or that the world is getting worse and worse. Quite the opposite.”
Hopium overdose.
“The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life.” -George Bernard Shaw
J-Gav on Tue, 9th Dec 2014 10:25 am
I’m hardly against enjoying the beauty of (any remaining) nature, breathing deeply and even doing some mindfulness meditation to calm frazzled nerves when we become the unwilling victims of external pressure or our own near-constant subservience to the perpetual parade of thoughts which race through our heads as if they constituted our very identities.
Smiling is good too. Nevertheless, and despite the fact that there are valid reasons for just being happy to be alive, present trends regarding the sustainability of our species require serious attention such that feel-good, ‘things-have-been-worse-in-the-past’ arguments are not likely to cut the mustard.