Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on December 5, 2014
UN to curb population by axing laws for sex, drugs, abortions for youths
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) realizes there are more young people on earth today than at any other time in human history, and the organization has a plan to reduce this segment of the population in order to achieve what it calls a “demographic dividend.”
To reach this goal, the UNFPA is working toward a program that will make abortion freely accessible to adolescents, eliminate the age of consent, remove drug and prostitution laws and restrict parental involvement when it comes to helping their children make decisions regarding their sexual development and health.
UN officials are reportedly emphatic about unleashing youth to the harsh realities of sexual libertinism, which will work to drive populations down across the globe. A recently released UNFPA report titled “The 2014 State of World Population” states that the younger generations must have all the sexual freedom and services they want.
“[Y]oung people require a wide range of sexual and reproductive health services, including … safe abortion care,” the report stresses.
The UNFPA is anxious to get such programs under way, claiming that legal systems in most nations are not following through in a timely manner with the agreements they allegedly signed in international human rights treaties.
“[They have] yet to catch up with the realities of adolescents and youth,” UNFPA officials assert, noting that unprecedented opportunities for progress exist for the youth, but that this can only become a reality if future generations’ populations are reduced.
However, it is contested that no such commitments were made via any UN treaties.
“No UN treaty mentions abortion, nor obliges countries to make youth vulnerable to adults offering sexual and reproductive services,” contends Rebecca Oas, Ph.D., according to LifeSiteNews.com. “Of particular concern to UNFPA are age of consent laws requiring parental permission to access abortion, contraceptives or other services like needle exchange programs for drug users.”
Leaving them to their own devices
UNFPA officials are adamant that laws prohibiting youth from having sex until they reach a minimum age keep youth from maturing and making responsible decisions on their own.
“[A]ge of consent laws contradict the idea that young people should participate in decisions that affect them in line with their evolving capabilities,” the UN authors of the 2014 report state.
The UNFPA goes even further by condemning laws designed to protect youth from harmful activities and lifestyles.
“[Prohibitions against] same-sex behavior, drug use and selling sex or sex work … fall particularly hard on young people realizing their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” UNFPA officials argue in their report.
Even though the writers of the report concede that parents should be the first to influence their child’s sexual development, they end up writing off this concept as being too idealistic.
“[This] does not happen the way it should … [as parents] do not know how to talk to their children about such matters,” the UNFPA insists.
UNFPA officials then completely throw out the need for parental guidance and put their faith in youths’ human nature.
“[Good choices] could be influenced by policy interventions, such as those that loosen age or parental-consent restrictions on adolescents’ access to services,” the UN policy makers reason in their report.
Less laws, less people
Oas argues that the UN uses lingo about liberty and productivity to hide its ultimate agenda, which is allegedly to increase mortality rates in the youth generation.
“While UNFPA’s primary concern is curbing population growth, its focus on young people is steeped in the language of human rights, maximizing potential and removing barriers to success,” Oas emphasizes. “Young people are not only the targets of the approach, but are also being groomed to be its chief proponents. That means giving them messages they are not hearing at home or in their communities.”
Oas, who is associate director of research for the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, also points out that dwindling birthrates are often proven to have adverse effects on society — a direct contradiction to the UNFPA’s plan for success.
“However, the premise that reducing the fertility of developing countries will catapult them into prosperity is questionable,” Oas explains. “Countries with low fertility and growing elderly populations face increasing financial burdens, since dependent children incur lower costs than dependent older people.”
She contends that the UNFPA has it all backwards, but is pressing forward with its plan to reach its primary objective — lower populations.
“Economists have observed that a drop in fertility tends to follow, rather than precede, increased economic prosperity, which is why the ‘demographic dividend’ appeared more pronounced in Asia than in Latin America or other developing regions,” Oas reports.
Even though the UNFPA report recognizes that limited schooling and jobs, as well as recessions, contribute to the oppression of youths, it clearly concentrates on a lack of sexual freedom as being the main evil holding young people back.
“[Poverty] can be a powerful barrier to individuals getting what they need to achieve their sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” the UN makers of the report emphasize.
Oas concludes that the UNFPA is dead set on unleashing youths to experience sexual libertinism, despite the known dangers, in order to reach its ultimate goal — global population control.
“In total, the UNFPA report asserts that the key to development is ensuring that adolescents’ sexual behavior is unsupervised, unrestricted, publicly funded, and, above all, non-procreative,” Oas warns. “UNFPA posits that the imposition of sexual anarchy upon youth will ensure their well-being and that of the whole world.”
30 Comments on "UN to curb population by axing laws for sex, drugs, abortions for youths"
penury on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 2:51 pm
Bullsh#t
Plantagenet on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 3:46 pm
In other words, the UN wants young folks to have the same access to sex, drugs, etc. as the bureaucrats in the UN have themselves.
Davy on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 3:52 pm
I would use all that money wasted on UN committees and double talk at UN cocktail parties to pay young people to have permanent sterilization. In fact I would eliminate most of the UN and put that money towards permanent sterilization. I would ask folks like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett to use their charities for the same.
There will be no social justice, climate mitigation, poverty eradication, ecosystem repair, and economic reforms until population stabilizes and declines. The declines are going to happen and at some point these declines are going to be swift. Why not get ahead of the curve. Will this ever happen? NO, but you get the point.
Drastic actions are needed with the primary focus on zero reproduction. Quit worrying about fairness, racism, or political correctness. Just gett’er done and now. I say pay these folks well make it worth their sacrifice. Every birth stopped is one less painful death because eventually over half the global population must begin a reduction. This means pain and suffering like none of us except the worst of the developing world can comprehend.
dolanbaker on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 4:17 pm
Check the source of that story!
Looks like a right wing pro-life bible thumping site.
Harquebus on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 4:48 pm
Population reduction is the only viable solution to resource depletion and pollution. If we don’t do it voluntarily, nature will do it for us and it won’t be pretty.
Newfie on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 4:56 pm
The latest models predict a population of 11 billion in 2100. And a temperature rise of 5 degrees Celcius. It’s going to be hot and crowded folks.
GregT on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 5:43 pm
5 degrees C temperature rise? Crowded?
Vacant is the word that immediately comes to mind.
Pveroi on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 5:51 pm
Just for fun; from dan brown book: if you knew in 100 hundred years the human species would die and the only way to save it was to flick a switch that randomly and instantly killed half the population, would you flick the switch?
jjhman on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 6:03 pm
I was suspicious at the title and it was clear from the first paragraph that this was an exercise in distorting the intent of UN programs by cherry picking words and interspersing their own nut-case quotes with real ones.
Why is anyone on this forum taking this screed seriously?
Why is it here?
Davy on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 6:08 pm
I couldn’t flick the switch. If you promise there is a heaven then I will volunteer to die. If there is instead reincarnation I want to come back as a dolphin and after that an eagle but in Alaska.
dolanbaker on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 6:16 pm
“Just for fun; from dan brown book: if you knew in 100 hundred years the human species would die and the only way to save it was to flick a switch that randomly and instantly killed half the population, would you flick the switch?”
No, would be the simple answer, I would lose at least some of my nearest and dearest! Or they would lose me!
Education and birth control would go a long way, failing that mass famine in areas that can no longer sustain rapid population growth combined with extreme measures to stop migrants from such areas.
coffeeguyzz on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 6:31 pm
I read and re-read this twice and still don’t know if it isn’t from the Onion or something. If this is both an accurate and serious proposal, (I’m highly dubious on both accounts), what are the odds of, say, Mo’s burkha-clad wife successfully persuading him that it’s okay for their four teenage daughters to produce numerous ‘suggestive’ selfies for internet distribution after a hard week’s worth of ‘sex work’.
Yeah, I’ll take hard money bets on that ever happening … even giving some pretty good odds … Any takers?
Makati1 on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 6:59 pm
Davy, If I could do it, ALL billionaires would be consigned to the moon, without protective suits, in a heartbeat. You only get that rich by plunder, theft and psychotic behavior. They think they can play god and try to form the world in their twisted idea of perfect.
Elimination of religion and the dogma of “go forth and multiply” would go a long way. Catholics still preach large families. Ditto for Muslims and Mormons. Not going to change.
But, it is too late anyway. We will go thru the bottleneck with all of it’s pain and death as all species do when they over run their resources. Blathering about it is a waste of time.
Makati1 on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 7:02 pm
Flip the switch? Play God? Only a psychotic person would like the opportunity.
There are plenty of them in DC. I’m glad they don’t have the switch … but they do have the nuclear button, and a War Congress now to authorize it’s use.
redpill on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 7:02 pm
Is this from a new Glen Beck “book”?
Davy on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 8:03 pm
But wait Mak, if you banish billionairs to the moon what about your super hero czar Putt the great? He is reported to be one of the richest men in the world certainly the richest polotician. At least you now admit he got to where he is at by “plunder, theft, and psychotic behavior.
Perk Earl on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 8:39 pm
We are closer to a die off event than we are to ever changing our procreative behavior, so guess which one comes first.
Makati1 on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 9:04 pm
Davy, maybe he will go also, but that is debatable and may just be more propaganda BS from the US. I never said he plundered anything. Do you work for the Ministry of Propaganda, putting words in my mouth? Maybe a lot of people would disappear if the truth was known.
I would actually take it down as low as $10M net worth and anyone who controls more than that amount would join them. No-ONE is worth more than that, and even $10M is debatable. Maybe 100 times the AVERAGE world per capita income? Is that too high? Level the playing field.
BTW: ALL military related equipment, navy, airforce, army, etc. materials and resources of ALL the planet’s governments, including nuclear weapons, would be gone along with ALL processed nuclear materials including spent fuel and current reactor fuels. All that would be left were bows and arrows, spears and the like. Nothing chemical or nuclear. Iron Age warfare, nothing else.
Aren’t you glad I don’t have the power to carry out my wishes? ^_^
Apneaman on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 9:53 pm
Don’t anybody go to the source and read it for yourself uninterpreted.
UNFPA: Delivering a world where every pregnancy is wanted,
every childbirth is safe and every young person’s potential fulfilled.
http://www.unfpa.org/
Speculawyer on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 10:14 pm
What a nut case conspiracy theory article.
Makati1 on Fri, 5th Dec 2014 11:14 pm
If Malls were restricted to necessities and media were restricted to facts, neither would exist. We can lose 99% of the stuff in our world and still have a long, happy, healthy life.
Edward Boyle on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 6:21 am
Conservatives have more kids as family life is stable. The source of the story has religious ads. Perversely enough, propaganda story or not, this could actually work.
Apneaman on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 9:07 am
How do you know Conservatives have more kids?
Dubya on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 10:32 am
This is all OBAMA’s fault. The UN is going take away our FREEDOMS to drive huge PICKUPS to MalWart to buy BIBLES. The SPACE ALIENS are over-populating AGENDA 51& are getting FREE ABORTIONS by selling their food stamps to ILLEGAL MEXICAN DRUG DEALERS.
Dubya on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 10:43 am
Sorry, I forgot to mention WARMISTS and GAY TEENAGE PREGNANCY in there, just stick them in wherever it feels good.
paulo1 on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 1:41 pm
I was waiting to hear about 1 world gubmint and black suburban suv(s), from somebody. I agree Mak, get rid of most of our crap and we could still have a great life. Of course, that assumes people will think, entertain themslves, and live deliberately.
This captures it.
Ferris: “I do have a test today, that wasn’t bullshit. It’s on European socialism. I mean, really, what’s the point? I’m not European. I don’t plan on being European. So who gives a crap if they’re socialists? They could be fascist anarchists, it still doesn’t change the fact that I don’t own a car.”
Kenz300 on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 7:17 pm
The right wing puts out such extreme articles to pump up their base……
Kenz300 on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 7:17 pm
The right wing puts out such extreme articles to pump up their base……
Jimmy on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 8:18 pm
I’m not only in favor of abortion; I believe in infanticide up to the age of 15.
MKohnen on Sat, 6th Dec 2014 8:38 pm
The article mentions the UNFPA report entitled “State of World Population 2014.” The one I was just reading is the “Power of 1.8 Billion” issue. Having read quite a bit of it, I’d say that the article above is on par with the kind of propaganda we’re all getting used to. It’s like reading western MSM articles about the Ukraine. In the UNFPA report, for instance, the issue of age of consent has to do with access to medical services such as abortions. Obviously, if some young girl has sex then gets pregnant, going home and getting consent from fundamentalist religious dad could actually end up getting her killed. So, yeah, there is a big issue about needing parental consent to getting an abortion or birth control. But the report does not suggest that the age of consent for sex should be dropped.
But blatant religious propaganda like this is to be expected now. The media repainting pictures however they desire has taken on Orwellean overtones lately. Case in point: Canada voted to support Hitlerist Nazism in the UN, and it didn’t even make the CBC news! Yet all the uninformed Canadians I’ve told about it react with shock and dismay.
It’s all so sick!