Page added on November 20, 2014
Unlike other goods, the price formation of oil will be determined not only by supply and demand, but also in part by geopolitical considerations, and, more importantly, active price management.
The news of oil having reached a 5-year low last week is nothing but bullish for U.S. consumers and corporations. Even though the black gold has been trading below $80/barrel, down -20 percent since June, the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that the current price decline is not over. Needless to say, many investors remain bullish on oil in the long run, and anticipate picking up bargains in many of the energy names that have suffered in the wake of the recent consolidation. The investment case and overall macro impact, however, are rather complex.
Unlike other goods, the price formation of oil will be determined not only by supply and demand, but also in part by geopolitical considerations, and, more importantly, active price management. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has acted as an international price cartel since 1960, a time when the oil market was largely dominated by multinationals. For this reason, it became the stated mission for OPEC member-countries to exercise sovereignty over their natural resources. The interesting flipside of OPEC’s mission is that a cartel of countries is not considered a legal entity, and, consequently, is not subject to commonly illegal price-fixing laws.
The peak in West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil reached in mid-2008 was the result of a booming world economy, and was also linked to a massive pool of speculative funds, mainly consisting of “hot money” chasing commodities. Whereas the OPEC cartel was reluctant to ease prices during the peak ascent of oil between 2004 and 2008, it is noteworthy that Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s most potent oil-exporting nation, has recently led with price concessions, despite the steep price decline of oil. Saudi Arabia’s move is said to help maintain the country’s 10 percent global market share, but draws harsh criticism from other OPEC members that are dependent on higher oil prices for export revenues.
Many observers link the origins of the Arab Spring, a previous wave of civil unrest in Middle Eastern and African nations, to wide gaps in income levels and lack of wealth distribution. Whereas Saudi Arabia, likely one of the best-positioned and most stable economies in the region, has widely addressed the issue, other OPEC nations are in dire need of maximizing their oil revenues. Russia and Iran, competing with Saudi Arabia in global markets, need oil to trade in excess of $100/barrel just to balance their budgets and create the basis for shared prosperity. The disconnect is glaringly obvious, as Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Iran are all members of OPEC.
Persistently lower oil prices will also have an impact on the U.S. domestic energy sector. It is conceivable that the current shale-gas boom may lose appeal, as could commitments made to the alternative energy sector in areas such as solar and wind power. Also, think of the very fuel-inefficient pickup truck or large SUV regaining prominence, as questions will undoubtedly surface as to why it is important to pay up for a slick hybrid or electric car (i.e., aside from concerns regarding status or the environment). Very favorable long-term developments, with respect to energy conservation and alternative forms of power, could go in reverse.
The political and socioeconomic complexity, including potential for conflict related to the current price trend of oil, is something to be considered when making investment decisions. Unlike in the 1970s, the U.S. is favorably positioned to withstand another “oil shock,” which is not centered on high but low(er) prices this time around. Further, investors need to consider that price trends are rarely one-directional, and may have the potential to revert, even abruptly. Ten-year volatility readings of spot oil prices are double those measured in U.S. stocks (S&P 500), with broad movements having ranged anywhere from -70 to +150 percent. While opportunity is a given, especially in consumer-sensitive sectors, we need to brace for a buildup in geopolitical tensions, especially among oil-producing nations.
6 Comments on "The End of Oil… and Other Things"
Perk Earl on Thu, 20th Nov 2014 6:42 pm
Off topic alert: Just as a side note from someone living northern CA, we’ve gotten a lot of rain so far and it is coming down heavily as I write this. I think CA’s drought condition will be markedly better at least north of SF after this rainy season. We’ll see about water levels south of SF.
Cripes! That means a bumper crop of weeds.
Makati1 on Thu, 20th Nov 2014 7:09 pm
Sounds a bit like 1929 all over again. “The Market is still going up! Buy stocks now and get rich(er)!” Problem is, everyone believes that they will be smart enough to get out just before the peak crashes. Then greed steps in and they think, “just one more day” and another and another and CRASH!
The Western future is built on fake wealth, not real things like factories or farms or even gold. (Poopoo gold all you want but the human mindset will value it over fiat paper as long as there is anything to trade.) The West, and all of it’s support ladder, is built on the stock market casino. IRAs, 401ks, retirement funds, mutual funds, are ALL dependent on the market casino not crashing. It took a world war to get the US out of the last crash in 29′. Wanna bet that that will be the last gasp of America in the next 10 years? Soon? We shall see…
TomGood on Fri, 21st Nov 2014 2:36 am
Sorry, but Russia is NOT a member of OPEC.
Davy on Fri, 21st Nov 2014 4:55 am
Mak, you are in a disconnect from reality. The east has all the same things you claim is fake about the west. The west has gold. I am trying to figure out if you consider us western humans a different species. You remind of the woman that is telling her friend all the things wrong with her friend’s marriage. The reality of the situation the woman is criticizing her own marriage and doesn’t realize it.
It appear with what is going down with Japan Asia will propagate a global crisis. Yes, Mak, your Asia may take us down. We know Asia is taking us down with consumption growth and population growth but that is longer term. We know Asian coal consumption is killing the earth. Please tell me why Asia is so special. Is it because you hate the west and now live in Asia?
Aire on Fri, 21st Nov 2014 8:46 am
I’d have to agree with Davy. It’s not just the “West” – it’s the 1st world nations and developing nations enabling corporations throughout the world along with their populations to plunder and pollute our planet. Of course it’s mainly the corporations causing all these growing problems. Sure the West and the be exact the Europeans started this. Leading to Americans creating a dream of endless desire to grow in endless functions. Asia is just joining in late to the party and like Davy said will likely be the tipping point only because of the populations in places like Japan, China, and India. Just my opinion but it appears to me that this will be where the storm hits first but soon hit the globe straight after following Europe and America.
Kenz300 on Fri, 21st Nov 2014 9:06 am
The worlds biggest environmental problem is OVER POPULATION…….
Endless population growth is not sustainable and only leads to more poverty, suffering and despair.