Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on October 5, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Can 11 billion people survive on this planet?

Can 11 billion people survive on this planet? thumbnail

AB23107

By 2100, there could be an extra four billion people roaming the planet – making it difficult to discern whether Earth will have enough resources to support the birth of practically another planet-worth of people. (Earth hit four billion in 1974).

That’s 11 billion people total, according to a new study by the University of Washington and the United Nations. The running estimate for total world population was that it would hover at 9 billion and then level off or decline, but the new UW study shows we are in for many more neighbors than that.

Where they’ll be 

Most of the growth will be in Africa, according to the UW study, where there is an 80 percent chance that the population will quadruple from around one billion to between 3.5 and 5.1 billion by the end of the century.

Asia, which has a population of 4.4 billion, will peak to about five billion in 2050, then decline. By 2030, India’s population is projected to surpass China’s, becoming the most populous country in the world. Populations in North America, Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean will each stay below one billion.

“A rapidly rising population could exacerbate challenges in the availability of natural resources and put considerable pressure on public health systems, particularly in poorer countries, making it harder to respond to infectious disease epidemics,” said Adrian Raftery, UW professor of statistics and sociology and corresponding author.

More people means more natural resources being used. According to the UN, as a result of overuse, growth and climate change, about two-thirds of the world’s populations will be considered “water-stressed regions” by 2025.

Behind the number

The findings, gathered by the UN and UW researchers, incorporate Bayesian statistics, which combine all available information to generate better predictions and provide a more accurate account than other studies.  It also incorporates data from the most recent UN population data.

According to the study, world population projections are based on life expectancy and fertility rates. If either changes, the projections shift.

Africa has some of the highest fertility rates in the world, making it difficult to accurately predict whether the infertility rate will decrease over the next century.

The UN and UW researchers used statistical methods based on combined government data and expert forecasters to estimate mortality and fertility rates, as well as international migration.

“An alternative way to [predict fertility rates] would be to project forward education rates, and then use these projections as a basis for projecting fertility.  The problem with this is that we don’t know future education rates, and forecasts of these are subject to error.”

Silver linings 

However, there is a “silver lining,” said Raftery. If Africa can reduce their high fertility rates faster, there will be more resources available for investment in infrastructure, education, and health and environmental protection, he adds.

“There is no consensus among experts about how many people the earth could sustain, but estimates range up to well above the UN extreme upper bound of 13 billion in 2100,” Raftery said.

seattlepi.com



6 Comments on "Can 11 billion people survive on this planet?"

  1. Perk Earl on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 2:40 am 

    Imagine;

    The year 2100
    11 billion people
    150 MBD of all oils
    4.2C increase in world temps
    590 ppm CO2
    3.8 ppm increase CO2 per annum
    0 ice in Arctic by Aug. 1st every year
    Amazon is a dust bowl
    99% of sea life gone from acidification
    West Antarctica ice sheet gone
    19 feet of sea level rise
    All 11b vaccinated for airborne Ebola
    1700 avg. daily caloric intake
    53 year avg. life expectancy
    2.3 avg. offspring per woman
    15 billion expected by 2050
    .001% of life-forms existing in 1900 exist in 2100
    55,000 people per sq. city mile
    1 liter of water per person per day
    30 billion avg. ads seen per person per year
    10 trillion tiny cameras watch every sq. inch to prosecute every crime within 24 hours.

    In the year 2955
    if man is still alive
    if woman can survive…

  2. Perk Earl on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 2:43 am 

    I meant 15 billion expected by 2150 (not 2050)

  3. Kenz300 on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 6:44 am 

    Endless population growth is not sustainable.

    Around the world we can find a food crisis, a water crisis, a declining fish stocks crisis, a Climate Change crisis, an unemployment crisis and an OVER POPULATION crisis.

    Overpopulation facts – the problem no one will discuss: Alexandra Paul at TEDxTopanga – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNxctzyNxC0

    ———————

    Wrap it up……. get it snipped……

    Birth Control Permanent Methods: Learn About Effectiveness

    http://www.emedicinehealth.com/birth_control_permanent_methods/article_em.htm

  4. Davy on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 7:57 am 

    Perk, your list sounds optimistic col (crying out loud). 2100 will be a vastly different world with or without BAU. Personally I think 2020 will be a vastly different world. The question is the duration of the transition and the degree of descent before a reboot at a stable post modern world. That is a wide berth of possibilities.

  5. antiwarforever on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 9:12 am 

    Of course they can, as a crowded, totalitarian (“brave new world” huxley) , sinister ant colony, -but nature, for her part, will not survive that. It is where we are heading to in about a century, I sadly believe it.

  6. Perk Earl on Mon, 6th Oct 2014 11:39 am 

    “Perk, your list sounds optimistic col (crying out loud). 2100 will be a vastly different world with or without BAU. Personally I think 2020 will be a vastly different world.”

    I agree, Davy. The list was in response to all these articles we keep seeing on population predictions for the long term future. I figured if they could leapfrog whatever it takes to get to 2100 and simply look at population total, I would sarcastically extrapolate other stats as well. I probably should have ended it with /sarc off.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *