Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 19, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Up or down in OPEC, its oil supply all comes back to the Saudis

Production

Oil prices have found some support from the potential for lower production from OPEC next year, as suggested by the group’s secretary general, Abdalla el-Badri.

Speaking to Platts by telephone from Vienna earlier this week, Badri was at pains to stress that he was not predicting the outcome of OPEC’s next scheduled meeting on November 27. Nor was he talking about a 500,000 b/d reduction in the group’s current 30 million b/d ceiling. He was, he said, talking about an outlook that pegged the call on OPEC crude at 29.5 million b/d. He was not talking about a decision by OPEC.

Badri, however didn’t make clear which outlook he was talking about. The latest forecasts from OPEC’s Vienna secretariat, released last week, see demand for OPEC crude averaging 29.45 million b/d and falling to 29.2 million b/d in 2015. Badri’s figure is closer to the International Energy Agency’s 29.6 million b/d estimate of the call on OPEC next year.

Nevertheless, Badri has directly raised the prospect of a reining-in of OPEC supply in 2015 as buoyant growth in non-OPEC supply — from the United States and Canada, in particular — more than meets growth in demand.

The big question is how any reining-in — either formally or informally — be done. OPEC’s ceiling is a number with little meaning because it is not the sum of 12 individual country quotas. This ceiling is supposed to include Iraq’s production, even though Iraq has not accepted a quota. How, therefore, would any cut — if one were agreed — be distributed?

Even more important is the question of who would cut. But first, let’s look at who is unlikely to.

Iran is hoping for a deal on the nuclear issue that will lead to the removal of sanctions that have slashed its crude output and exports. It will be more interested in boosting output and exports than reining them in further.

Iraq has lost nearly 300,000 b/d of pipeline exports through Turkey as a consequence of the jihadist advance across vast areas of northern Iraq. It now relies on its southern outlets in the Persian Gulf to export its oil, but pumping constraints are limiting the volumes that can be moved to the these southern terminals from the fields. Baghdad has not, in any case, agreed to participate in any kind of OPEC production management system.

Libya, thanks to a series of agreements with various militia and tribal groups, has boosted output back to around 700,000 b/d, half of the 1.4 million b/d it achieved before the oil field shut-ins and port blockades began in May last year. The climb in oil production in recent weeks comes, however, despite the deepening political chaos in the country. Libya will be doing everything it can to maintain and increase output further.

Among OPEC members, Nigeria and Angola have been particularly hit by the US shale boom. US imports of Nigerian crude plunged by 74% over the past five years, to 239,000 b/d in 2013 from 922,000 b/d in 2008. And the slide continues: US imports of Nigerian crude averaged just 86,000 b/d in the first half of 2014 compared with 338,000 b/d in the same six months of last year. Nigeria will be continuing its search for new markets rather than restricting its access to them. US imports of Angolan crude dropped by 60% over the five years, to 201,000 b/d last year from 504,000 b/d in 2008. January-to-June volumes fell to 116,000 b/d this year from 200,000 b/d in 2013.

Any meaningful reining-in of OPEC output, therefore, has to come from Saudi Arabia, the only OPEC member with significant surplus capacity and the ability to adjust its production up and down in response to market conditions.

But Saudi Arabia’s priorities are far from clear at this point. It emerged last week that the kingdom had cut its its crude production by some 400,000 b/d between July and August. There has been no explanation from Riyadh for this cut, which has been interpreted in some quarters as an indication that the OPEC kingpin is ready to defend prices. But if this was indeed a signal, it conflicted with Saudi Aramco’s crude price cuts for October, announced a few days earlier.

Saudi Arabia and other Middle East producers have long been focussing on Asia, the engine of demand growth. But as the US shale revolution continues to transform world oil markets, they are now having to compete in Asia against West African and other producers that have lost market share in the US.

Saudi oil minister oil minister Ali Naimi, in Kuwait last week for a regular meeting of Gulf energy ministers, was sanguine about the oil price fall below $100/barrel. He didn’t see what the big fuss was all about and said oil prices went up and down all the time.

Analysts and journalists will continue to debate whether Saudi Arabia’s priority is market share over price, or vice versa. But, for the time being, the enigmatic Saudis are giving nothing away.

platts



5 Comments on "Up or down in OPEC, its oil supply all comes back to the Saudis"

  1. Plantagenet on Fri, 19th Sep 2014 12:47 pm 

    US production is going to go up by another million or so barrels/day next year thanks to fracking in the Permian basin and other shale plays. OPEC will have to cut production by at least that much to keep the oil markets stable.

  2. Makati1 on Sat, 20th Sep 2014 3:04 am 

    Plant, thanks for the laugh. We shall see…

  3. Nony on Sun, 21st Sep 2014 8:04 am 

    Most sources estimate another million bpd increase in 2015. We will finish this year at 9 million bpd (averaging 8.5 over the whole year). Next year will start at 9 million bpd and finish at 10 million bpd (averaging 9.5 over the year).

    The rigs are in the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Plenty of well location inventory left to drill.

    Really, the only thing that would stop it would be a price crash.

    P.s. And I know Rock will come along to say it doesn’t mean anything since it’s not 30/bbl. But 100 is still a lot better than 150. Plus, Hubbert will look kind of silly with ignoring price-motivated drilling…and with the U.S repeaking at the end of 2015. You can’t have it both ways…price is the only thing that matters (not volume) and then Hubbert was a genius.

  4. Davy on Sun, 21st Sep 2014 8:29 am 

    Noo, like I mentioned to M in a different thread what about the world supply situation? One or two MIL/BPD is nothing to crow about in the grand scheme of things with declines elsewhere. The US is still a net importer or are you one of those US energy independence advocates claiming ever increasing US supplies? Do the math worldwide not just here in the US. Doesn’t that make more sense considering we live in a global world and we are a net importer?

  5. Nony on Sun, 21st Sep 2014 8:52 am 

    It’s not 30/bbl and it’s not 150/bbl. If you had not gotten those 3 million barrels per day from the U.S. LTO, overall production would have peaked and price would have been 150/bbl.

    If your rhetorical opposition is to a “everything rocks” viewpoint or to predictions in 2004 of 30 for the forseeable future…than I actually am on your side.

    But if you endorse the Campbell/Ace/Deffeyes/TOD/PO.com view from 2005-2008 of a hard peak (and even in some cases…civilization collapsing!) then I’m opposed.

    What we have instead is this squishy in the middle POD.

    But to ignore 3 million bpd is insane. Oil is a very price inelastic commodity. So drops (or raises) in production will make price spike (crash). 3 million moves the needle. It’s like 4% of world supply. Believe me…if you LOST 3 million bpd, you would feel it. so having gotten it has staved off the 150/bbl wolf.

    Also, it pretty dramatically illustrates how price incentivizes alternate drilling practices, alternate formations and even R&D in these practices and formations. The economist view of oil rather than the geologist view of it (Hubbert never even mentioned price in his 1950s paper).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *