Page added on September 5, 2014
Rising energy consumption, new environmental concerns, and political uncertainty in the Middle East could boost the need for clean energy.
As tensions in the Middle East mount precipitously, and show every likelihood of continuing for years or even decades, the U.S. needs to step up its efforts to achieve energy independence. Historically, the U.S. has been able to rely on Arab nations to meet about 30% of its oil needs, but the explosive political landscape in the Middle East could restrict or even shut down that supply at any time.
While the erstwhile popular theory of ‘peak oil’, which postulates that domestic supplies of U.S. oil reached their peak in 2005 and will falter in the future has been widely discredited, it still contains some truth. Even if oil production is not declining, energy consumption is rising rapidly, which is the other side of the coin. At the same time, environmental regulations that restrict the ability of oil companies to drill in protected areas like the Arctic Natural Wildlife Refuge puts pressure on new drilling, and can still lead to an energy shortfall.
On the back of this situation, natural gas has risen in importance. It provides a seemingly endless supply of energy for everything from heating to electricity. Currently, natural gas accounts for 27% of electricity generation stateside, driven by low natural gas prices, and is projected to rise to 30% by 2040. Despite political controversy over ‘fracking,’ a technique used to extract shale gas from the ground, there is little reason to believe that the U.S. can practically afford to impose limits in this arena given the immense value of this resource for our energy infrastructure. In addition, the U.S. currently has 2.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, which is enough to last for 92 years, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
However, these statistics are based on demand remaining static at today’s levels. They fail to factor in the possibility of an oil supply deficit in the future, either due to government regulations that restrict new drilling or perhaps a shock in the Middle East, which would automatically lead to the faster consumption of natural gas and cause a supply/demand imbalance in that sector as well.
This means that other sources of energy will be required to supplement natural gas for the U.S. to achieve energy independence.
One possibility is biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel, which are obtained from plant tissues and are renewable. However, these fuels generate much less energy than crude oil and are difficult to refine. Researchers are working on methods to counter these factors but are still very early in that process. Biofuels are also, contrary to popular notion, not carbon neutral. The other options are traditional sources such as coal and nuclear, which will continue to provide a steady percentage of our energy needs. However, the environmental concerns surrounding these fuels, as with biofuels, could hamper production and provide an impetus for the generation of clean energy, driven by solar, hydroelectric, wind, geothermal, and hydrogen fuel cell technologies.
This is supported by a new report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which echoes alarms about global warming and highlights the need for the U.S. to seriously examine its progress on energy.
Today, clean energy accounts for only 8% of electricity generation and 11% of total energy production in the U.S. The reason for this is the high expense of producing clean energy relative to the output, and consequently pricing. In addition, investment in low carbon technologies fails to yield sufficient savings to make it cost effective for the power sector and industrial consumers, leading to a slower migration to energy efficient technologies. Making this scenario even more complicated are the mixed signals from policymakers over the years on carbon pricing, which underpins the economics in this arena.
This can all change, however, at the 21st United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference, set to take place in Paris in 2015. The UNFCCC is expected to set a global protocol for the reduction of CO2 emissions, to be enacted in 2020. The clarity from such a protocol is expected to set the market for carbon at a level sufficiently high to justify investments in environmentally friendly technologies, which would then give both producers and consumers of clean energy better visibility on their investments.
The clean energy sector in the U.S. still has a long way to go. Unlike Europe and China, where the adoption of such technologies is progressing rapidly, American producers have yet to reach the critical mass required to bring down prices, and consumers still lack a real incentive – other than a desire to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – or even options to switch to such sources of energy. This will gradually change as the industry matures but will require U.S. policymakers to push for energy independence.
The turmoil in the Middle East should motivate us to act. In a high-tech world, all commercial activity depends on a stable, sufficient and affordable source of energy. That energy has historically come primarily from oil, but just as natural gas has emerged as a crucial fuel in this environment, it’s time for clean energy to catch up as well. It’s no longer just an environmental imperative but an economic one.
7 Comments on "Why clean energy is ripe for U.S. growth"
rockman on Fri, 5th Sep 2014 3:31 pm
“American producers have yet to reach the critical mass required to bring down prices, and consumers still lack a real incentive…”. Not entirely true. I’ve bragged about the growth of wind power in Texas several times so it might be deemed unsightly to do it again. But earlier this year wind reached a record 30% of all Texas electrical production. Granted it didn’t last for long but it obviously went a long way to keeping prices down.
But the reason such an alt may be working much better here than the other states is that it has never been pushed as a replacement for existing fossil fuel based energyroduction. Especially true with respect to our huge coal (low Btu lignite actually). Wind could never be justified as a replacement for the coal-fired plants which have paid out long ago and have a century’s supply of low cost fuel. But on a head to head competition with regards to building out new infrastructure wind obviously does well against coal.
Wind power don’t replace coal in Texas. But it’s doing a very good job supplementing it as the state’s economy continues to boom as more folks and companies relocate here.
ghung on Fri, 5th Sep 2014 4:00 pm
“….the erstwhile popular theory of ‘peak oil’, which postulates that domestic supplies of U.S. oil reached their peak in 2005 and will falter in the future has been widely discredited…”
It’s easy to discredit something you’ve mis-represented in the first place. Anyway, I keep a folder of these articles so as to visit them upon their authors at an appropriate time in the future,, just to be spiteful.
rockman on Fri, 5th Sep 2014 8:26 pm
“…that domestic supplies of U.S. oil reached their peak in 2005…”. I wonder if the author is really that ignorant of very well documented FACTS such as “domestic supplies of U.S. oil” peaked in 1971. Or if he expects his readers will be so ignorant as to not be able to do a 20 second Internet search to easily show his statement confuses the possibility of the global PO date with the US PO date.
Makati1 on Fri, 5th Sep 2014 9:15 pm
Fortune … says it all. Another finance rag full of misinformation trying to keep BAU going for a bit longer. The West needs a big war and now!
Renewables will not ever make a difference in most countries with ‘for profit’ capitalism. Not even Germany. Too much invested in the BAU system to abandon it and go with renewables. Single home units will spread, but even that will not add up to a noticeable percentage.
We still have enough hydrocarbons to fry the planet and I see the heat rising until it cannot. They are now talking about a 4F rise by 2050. It seems that the speed of temperature increase is also increasing. Mostly at the poles where melting ice will make a huge difference in ocean levels over the next century. After that, I doubt there will be anyone to notice.
Kenz300 on Sat, 6th Sep 2014 11:40 am
The expansion of renewable energy sources continues ….around the world alternative energy sources continue to grow.
If we are to have any hope of dealing with Climate Change the transition to safer, cleaner and cheaper alternative energy sources needs to increase at a faster pace.
Global Renewable Energy Status Uncovered
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/08/global-renewable-energy-status-uncovered?page=all
———–
Renewables Provide 56 Percent of New US Electrical Generating Capacity in First Half of 2014
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/07/renewables-provide-56-percent-of-new-us-electrical-generating-capacity-in-first-half-of-2014
Boat on Sun, 7th Sep 2014 6:50 am
CHP and nat gas together are not considered green but are rarely mentioned when we talking about streeetching oil resources. But this is the driving source behind the ability to import oil to the US/refine it and resale it as a finished petroleum product to the tune of 2 billion barrels a day and growing.
Kenz300 on Sun, 7th Sep 2014 6:53 pm
How Fossil Fuel Interests Attack Renewable Energy
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/05/how-fossil-fuel-interests-attack-renewable-energy
——————–
Nuclear Giant Exelon Launches Front Group to Cover Its Assets, Undermine Renewable Energy?
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/06/nuclear-giant-exelon-launches-front-group-to-cover-its-assets-undermine-renewable-energy?page=all