Register

Peak Oil is You


Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /var/www/peakoil.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/random-image-widget/random_image.php on line 138

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /var/www/peakoil.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/random-image-widget/random_image.php on line 139

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 31, 2013

Bookmark and Share

IEA Forecasts Sustained Energy Growth, But No ‘Era of Oil Abundance’

Production
  • The IEA’s latest long-term forecasts highlights the growth of unconventional oil and gas, especially in North America, but does not see this leading to much lower oil prices.
  • In their main scenario fossil fuels will still meet more than three-fourths of the world’s energy needs by 2035, despite significant growth in renewable energy.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) released its latest World Energy Outlook (WEO) in November, looking twenty-plus years into our energy future. The trends it describes add nuance and detail to last year’s projections, rather than upending them.  Among other things they advance the expected date of global oil production leadership by the US to 2015 but suggest these gains may be short-lived and will not lead to “cheap oil.”  The IEA also envisions a reshuffling of the traditional roles of energy importing, exporting and consuming countries, against a backdrop of steadily increasing energy-related greenhouse gas emissions.

As in previous years, the new WEO examines the full range of energy supply and demand, with a focus this time on the sources and uses of petroleum, and the emergence of Brazil as an oil and energy power. While recognizing that they might be underestimating the potential for technology or additional resource discoveries to sustain the growth of “light tight oil”, or shale oil, which together with oil sands and gas liquids is a primary driver of oil supply growth today, the IEA forecasts it would peak by 2025.

That puts the burden for supporting oil demand growth and the replacement of supplies lost to natural decline after 2025 back onto the Middle East producers. So in the IEA’s view, OPEC’s loss of market power appears temporary. A corollary to this is that the agency does not anticipate a sustained drop in oil prices, but rather a gradual increase of about 16% by 2035. That’s because the unconventional oil helping to drive current market shifts is still relatively high-cost, compared to the large conventional oil resources of the Middle East.

Although the IEA expects the global oil market to grow from its present level of around 90 million barrels per day (MBD) to 101 MBD in 2035, that change would be less than their forecasted equivalent global growth in gas, renewables or even coal. The concentration of oil demand in transport and petrochemicals would also increase, while other uses contract slightly. This is consistent with last year’s observation that the center of the oil market is shifting towards Asia, since around one-third of the total anticipated growth in oil demand is for diesel to fuel goods deliveries in Asia.

The shift toward Asia applies to other forms of energy, as well, including natural gas and the expanded use of renewable energy.  This trend is already altering global energy trading patterns, and with the US becoming more energy self-sufficient  the IEA sees a new role for energy exports from Canada to supply Asia. That  includes both LNG and oil sands, which Fatih Birol, the IEA’s chief economist, recently indicated the agency sees as only a minor, incremental threat to the climate compared to growing coal use.

An added nuance in this year’s outlook is that the IEA now expects world-leading energy growth in China to be overtaken in a decade or so by faster growth in India, while rapidly growing consumption in the Middle East could result in that region posting the  second-highest growth in primary energy demand through 2035, especially for natural gas.

In the launch presentation in London Dr. Birol assessed the consequences of strong North American energy growth and shifting exports and imports for the prices that industries pay for energy. Because any exports of low-cost North American shale gas must be priced to cover the cost of liquefaction and long-haul freight, plus a margin, global natural gas prices should converge somewhat but still not equalize among the major consuming regions. As a result, the IEA expects US-based energy-intensive industries to have a persistent cost advantage in both gas and electricity, enabling them to increase their share of global markets. That has implications for employment and economic growth, while sustained energy price disparities should also drive energy efficiency improvements in response.

Another issue that received prominent attention at the launch was the always controversial matter of subsidies, for both conventional and renewable energy. The IEA estimated global fossil fuel subsidies at $544 billion 2012–mainly in developing countries and Middle East oil producers–resulting in “wasteful consumption” and fewer benefits for the poor than commonly claimed. And while supporting the use of subsidies to promote greater use of renewable energy, the agency’s Executive Director, Maria van der Hoeven, made a particular point about the necessity for such subsidies to be carefully targeted and very responsive to changes in technology cost.

The IEA was founded in the aftermath of the 1973-74 Arab Oil Embargo and will celebrate its 40th anniversary next year. I couldn’t help thinking about that as I reviewed the updated WTO materials. They’re interesting as an annual update, but also in reflecting how the world of energy has changed since the oil shocks of the 1970s.

The rapid development of unconventional oil and gas that underpins the IEA’s latest forecast would likely have amazed the industry veterans I met at the start of my career, but still fit within their worldview. I think they would have found the projected growth of renewable energy, supported by climate-change-inspired subsidies that surpassed $100 billion per year in 2012 more futuristic and surprising. Yet despite the anticipated expansion of renewable energy sources over the next 22 years, the IEA envisions the share of fossil fuels in the world’s total energy supply only falling from 82% today to 76% in its main “New Policies” scenario.  That will seem overly cautious to many, but it underlines the challenges involved in changing such massive systems.

I’d like to wish my readers all the joys of the holiday season and a happy and prosperous New Year.

Energy Outlook



5 Comments on "IEA Forecasts Sustained Energy Growth, But No ‘Era of Oil Abundance’"

  1. Newfie on Tue, 31st Dec 2013 1:01 am 

    “Sustainable growth.” Now there’s a delusion for you.

  2. Anthony McCarthy on Tue, 31st Dec 2013 1:03 am 

    This is all very interesting,it seems that the oil age will end in a whimper not a bang as some of the peak oil doomers were predicting. It remains to be seen if the late and great Matt Simmons was correct as regards Saudi oil production.
    I do feel that the oil drum people were a little premature in taking down their tent!
    The growth in solar is following what the late Herman Sheer predicted and with the like of GE starting to include battery storage in their wind-farms the “unreliability” actually the indeterminacy of wind-power will be overcome. Depending upon the location the actual variation in annual wind-power can be under 10% year on year so it is very reliable but intermittent. Also I cannot recall a day when the sun failed to rise.
    So what part of NO FUEL COST do ye not understand?

  3. Makati1 on Tue, 31st Dec 2013 1:20 am 

    Production is only part of Peak Oil. The ability to buy it is more likely to end the use of hydrocarbons long before they run out. Ditto for all the ‘alternates’. Those windmills, solar panels and batteries do not make themselves out of thin air. All are likely to use as much energy in their life cycle as they can produce. So, yes, the oil age is likely to end in a bang and soon. The real GDP of the world is decreasing, NOT growing.

  4. Arthur on Tue, 31st Dec 2013 10:50 am 

    I do feel that the oil drum people were a little premature in taking down their tent!

    Anthony, I don’t think so. TOD came to the same conclusion as the IEA does. When I joined this forum exactly two years ago, I did so because I thought we were on the verge of a carbon crash, in line with ASPO predictions and people like Campbell, Heinberg, Simmons, etc. That position is untenable in 2014. It is difficult to foresee a serious geological induced supply crunch of carbon fuel before 2030-2040. Peakoil was about conventional oil and that story was correct. Yawn. Natural gas and shale are next, followed by possibly methane hydrates, God forbid. And then there is the possibility to return to old ‘dead conventional fields’ with new extraction technologies and this time suck them really dry, if you excuse my French. If you are looking for ‘big events’, turn to geopolitics and finance. In fact, these two complexes could easily ensure severe disruptions of carbon supply for military, political or financial, not geological reasons, to the tune that nobody talks about carbon fuel depletion anymore, because this fuel will no longer reach end consumers. A war between Iran and Saudi-Arabia would be a perfect example of such an event. Energy is going to remain a topic of the utmost importance, ever more with every passing year.

  5. Kenz300 on Wed, 1st Jan 2014 4:54 pm 

    The price of oil, coal and nuclear keeps rising and causing environmental damage.

    The price of wind and solar keeps dropping and it is safe and clean.

    The transition has begun and continues to grow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *