Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 16, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Iran Minister Says Nuclear Talks Will Continue

Iran Minister Says Nuclear Talks Will Continue thumbnail

Iran Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the Islamic Republic is committed to reaching an accord over nuclear activities even as the U.S. seeks to punish companies for possibly violating sanctions.

Zarif, in an interview today on CBS’s “Face the Nation” television program, said it was “a very wrong move” for the U.S. government to freeze assets of companies doing business with Iran while a deal aimed at keeping his country from developing nuclear weapons is being pursued.

“We are committed to the implementation of the plan of action that we adopted in Geneva,” Zarif said. “But we believe that it takes two to tango.”

High-level talks in Vienna between six countries and Iran were disrupted after the Treasury Department on Dec. 12 said it was freezing assets and banning transactions of entities that attempt to evade the sanctions, including by doing business with the National Iranian Tanker Co., Iran’s primary shipper of crude oil.

The companies designated as sanctions violators include Eyvaz Technic Manufacturing Co., an Iranian firm that the Treasury said was involved in procuring sensitive items for use in Iran’s centrifuge program, and the Exploration and Nuclear Raw Materials Production Co., a subsidiary of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, which was cited for overseeing uranium discovery, mining, and mineral processing operations in Iran.

The Treasury also said it targeted companies, including Singapore-based Singa Tankers, for providing support to the National Iranian Tanker Co.

Nuclear Accord

The Obama administration pledged in the accord reached last month in Geneva that it would oppose any new sanctions during the next six months while trying to negotiate a solution to the decade-long dispute over Iran’s nuclear activities.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry appeared before the House Foreign Affairs Committee last week to defend the preliminary six-month accord that provides for a freeze on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a limited easing of sanctions.

Some U.S. lawmakers oppose the deal as inadequate and are pushing for new sanctions on Iran.

“Many of us are very skeptical about the conditions under which this pause is being undertaken,” Arizona Republican Senator John McCain said today on “Face the Nation”.

New Sanctions

McCain said he was considering pushing for new sanctions that would go into effect if a broader deal isn’t reached in six months.

“There is the scenario if you were the Iranians just keep dragging out these negotiations, meanwhile the centrifuges still spin and they progress towards this point where all it takes is the turn of a wrench and they have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Adding fresh sanctions while talks are under way would hurt relations with allies who have helped the U.S. and undermine Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, Wendy Sherman, the State Department’s undersecretary for political affairs, told the Senate Banking Committee during a Dec. 12 hearing.

The U.S. and its allies say Iran is pursuing the capability to make a nuclear weapon. Iran says its nuclear program is for civilian energy and medical research only.

Rice Meeting

President Barack Obama has said he is committed to trying diplomacy to resolve the tensions with Iran, even as he gauged the chances of a successful agreement on the nuclear issue as no better than 50-50 at a Dec. 7 forum in Washington.

The White House today said that National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken, along with unnamed officials from the State and Treasury departments, hosted Israeli National Security Advisor Yossi Cohen and other Israeli officials for meetings last week.

The discussions focused on efforts by nations involved in the peace talks, including Russia and France, “to pursue a lasting and comprehensive settlement that would resolve the international community’s concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program,” according to the e-mailed statement. The U.S. officials reaffirmed Obama’s goal “of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

Zarif also said today that the Iranian government isn’t holding Robert Levinson, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and Central Intelligence Agency contractor who has been missing since visiting Kish Island to meet a source in March 2007. Zarif said Iranian security officials who investigated the disappearance lost track of Levinson after he checked out of his hotel.

“We have no trace of him in Iran,” Zarif said.

Bloomberg



4 Comments on "Iran Minister Says Nuclear Talks Will Continue"

  1. BillT on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:55 am 

    Western war mongers want war, not peace. If they don’t get one soon, their economies will crash and burn under the weight of debt and contracting energy.

  2. DC on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 2:33 am 

    Bloomberg is so full shyt is isnt funny anymore. Iran is not ‘working’ on any nuclear weapons. Nor are any of these sham ‘accords’ about that. They are about waging endless war on Iran, just by other means. The nuclear Mcguffin is just an excuse, and a poor one at that, to endlessly harass and punish Iran.

  3. Bob Inget on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 8:58 pm 

    Read more at: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/irans-s-300-missiles-1240-mile-range-war-dance/2013/12/15/

    Israel could be preparing to destroy Russian S-300 SAM’s either before they land in Iran or soon after. THese SAM’s are mobile and could be shipped in one of those humongous Russian freight aircraft. Doubting Israel is dumb enough to shoot down a Russian aircraft, waiting for partial deployment seems more likely. Will Iran turn the other
    cheek? As sure as they are Christians.

    Putin has decided to lift an old ban on shipping these supersonic missiles to Iran no doubt because of shared interest in Syria. If Iran is destroyed, Russia loses an important buffer and allie.

  4. Change Iran Now on Tue, 17th Dec 2013 3:36 am 

    During all these efforts by Sec. Kerry and President Obama to cut a deal at almost any price, it amazes me that there has never been a mention of including concessions on Iran’s human rights abuses. If you are going to negotiate with a nation under the belief that their word is their bond, behavior is a pretty important component of any deal. Simply taking a regime’s leaders at their word without any demonstrable proof is naive at best and stupid at worse. If the US were to hold Iran accountable for example in halting public executions, releasing political prisoners and loosening restrictions on a free press and internet and satellite TV access to outside news sources, then you might be persuaded to believe that Iran is indeed wanting to change. But absent any of those moves, there is little to show that Iran’s leadership — at its core — has really changed at all and thus can’t be trusted to hold up its end of any nuclear bargain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *