Page added on October 16, 2013
In 1614, Captain John Smith arrived off the coast of Maine searching for minerals, whales, and wealth. But the greatest bounty he discovered was actually fish. Smith and his crew stumbled upon vast schools of cod, a valuable commercial fish and a kitchen staple in Europe. Dried or salted, the nourishment from North America’s rich seas paved the way for colonization of a vast new continent.
Inevitably, these deep-water fish became an economic centerpiece of the New World. Cities like Boston transformed from basic settlements into thriving cities by trading cod for European goods and Caribbean sugar. But in the 1600s the world was a much less crowded place. Today, with the human population expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, we have many more hungry mouths to feed. But like Smith, we sit on the edge of a potentially vast resource for fighting hunger: fish.
In the late 1980s — more than 350 years after Smith boasted of endless bounty — the Atlantic cod fishery collapsed. In a now-familiar story, overfishing, habitat destruction, and bycatch combined to decimate the once-robust cod schools. Tens of thousands of fishermen were out of work, and an affordable culinary staple since the 1600s all but disappeared from kitchens.
Unfortunately, we still haven’t learned our lesson. We move from one species to another, ruthlessly fishing until all our hooks come up empty. When fisheries collapse, something more is lost besides one species in a sea of others. We lose an opportunity to feed needy people a source of healthy, wild protein.
No one wants to see seafood disappear from our dinner plates as fisheries collapse. But others won’t survive these losses: 1 billion of the world’s poorest people rely on seafood as their main source of animal protein. Until now, we’ve fed our increasingly crowded world by clearing more forest, planting more crops, and dumping more water and more fertilizer on the fields. But this cycle can’t continue.
Thankfully, we have a rare opportunity to feed millions of people and restore the abundant oceans that John Smith encountered centuries ago. It’s not a radical idea, but one backed by sound science and experience. Fish stocks can and will bounce back — if we let them.
The formula is simple: set science-backed quotas, reduce bycatch, and protect habitats that foster marine life. It won’t be as hard as you might think. Just 25 countries control 76 percent of the world’s coastal oceans, and a mere 10 countries control 51 percent. We don’t need an international treaty to resuscitate our oceans — we just need to convince these key governments to better manage their fisheries.
This year, World Food Day is centered around sustainable food systems and their contribution to food security and nutrition. Healthier oceans are the key to strengthening worldwide food security and providing healthy protein to hungry people. According to a recent study in Science, the oceans could yield up to 40 percent more seafood if the world’s fisheries are better managed. That means our oceans could feed 700 million people a healthy, wild seafood meal every day, forever. By saving the oceans we can feed the world.
4 Comments on "Save the Oceans, Feed the World"
DC on Wed, 16th Oct 2013 6:33 pm
Ah, more pro-growth, pro-population propaganda from the fake ‘liberals’@ huffpo.
See! we could squeeze 40% more out of the oceans, if they were just better ‘managed’.
Think of all the needy people the oceans feed! (We got to protect the oceans so all the needy people can breed more needy people that need the oceans to eat so they breed more needy people and….)
You get the idea.
Q/ That means our oceans could feed 700 million people a healthy, wild seafood meal every day, forever. By saving the oceans we can feed the world.
And WTF is this supposed to mean? 700 extra million? The oceans cant take the abuse our corporations and industrial fishermen are putting on it *now*.
The simple fact is, it is not the ‘needy’ people of the world that are vacuuming up the oceans fish, and anything else there nylon, mulit-kilometer long drag-nets scoop up along with it. Its mega-factory ships run by the worlds largest corporations doing that tyvm.
But apparently, no one told huffpo about that inconvenient truth.
For all its fake liberal creds, huff-po is all about maintaining the current corporate status-quo. Its clear the author subscribes to the idea of the worlds oceans as a corporate resource to be ‘managed’. His only complaint it appears, is that the current system is not as ‘efficient’ as he would wish it. The idea of leaving the oceans along never comes up of course.
DC on Wed, 16th Oct 2013 8:28 pm
leaving the oceans *alone* sorry. Point being-Huffpo seems to think MORE ocean harvesting is the way to ‘fix’ things, when in fact, the only thing that can save it now, is a less harvesting, a lot less. How ‘efficient’ its managed is not even close to the point.
Roman on Wed, 16th Oct 2013 10:23 pm
How about we start a ocean wide fish farm then we can feed the universe.
BillT on Thu, 17th Oct 2013 3:32 am
Economists/Capitalists see ANY resource, alive or dead, as a source of wealth and power, nothing more. They all ASSUME they will be gone when the SHTF. I think/hope Mother Nature has other plans and shuts down their greed with climate change BEFORE we have decimated everything.