Page added on October 2, 2013
A rise in output of North American tight oil will not trouble OPEC, the group’s secretary general said on Tuesday, maintaining his view that the new supply source will not significantly impact the group’s market share.
Abdullah al-Badri, attending the annual Oil and Money conference in London, referred to forecasts of rising production of tight oil, also known as shale, but said that would not be a problem for the 12-member OPEC.
“I do not think that with this quantity OPEC is in trouble,” Badri said.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, sceptical of information available, has been looking more closely at shale oil this year. It decided in May to carry out its own investigation on shale’s potential.
Already, the U.S. shale boom has altered the landscape of oil trade. For example, OPEC members Nigeria and Algeria have seen demand for their crude fall in the U.S., the world’s top consumer, because of growing domestic supply.
But this need not alarm core OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia in the longer run, according to a senior International Energy Agency (IEA) official also at the conference.
“In the next few years we will continue to see growth in U.S. shale oil, which is very good news for the U.S. and the rest of the world,” IEA Chief Economist Fatih Birol told Reuters.
“But I don’t think that this has either the resource base or the economics to replace Middle East oil,” he added. The IEA advises industrialised countries on energy policy.
Tight oil output would be in decline by 2018 and the cost of such developments means that a sharp drop in oil prices would restrain supplies, Badri said.
“This tight oil is hanging on the cost. If the (price) were to drop to $60 to $70, then it would be out of the market completely.”
Current prices, of $108 a barrel for Brent crude, are at an acceptable level for producers and consumers, he said.
4 Comments on "OPEC Relaxed about Cost-Sensitive Shale Oil"
BillT on Wed, 2nd Oct 2013 2:02 am
Smart man. They know a bubble when they see it.
GregT on Wed, 2nd Oct 2013 3:05 am
I’m sure OPEC would love to see oil drop back to $28 bbl. All of this unconventional oil must have them really upset.
Kenz300 on Wed, 2nd Oct 2013 4:37 am
Second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste could be a bigger threat to OPEC.
Biofuels can now be made from waste or trash. Every landfill and dump around the world can now be converted to produce biofuels, energy and recycled materials for new products.
There is a huge amount of waste in the world just waiting to be converted to biofuels.
BillT on Wed, 2nd Oct 2013 7:37 am
Kenz you should not drink so much of that cool aid. It warps your ability to reason.
First, to use all that ‘trash’ would take a converter at EACH dump. $$$$$$$$$$ OR, are you going to haul it hundreds of miles to a central converter that takes all of the fuel made by the algae to move the trucks?
Second: That ‘waste’ contains millions of tons of toxic materials, metals, chemicals and drugs. Are you going to separate all of those billions of tons by hand? Good luck with that!
Not to mention huge CO2 content that would have to be released.
Kenz, have you ever actually been to a large landfill as it is being filled? If not, take a tour here…
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=image&fr=mcafee&sz=all&va=3rd+world+landfill
These are typical landfills and are what you are proposing to ‘recycle’.