Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 14, 2013

Bookmark and Share

U.S., Russia Reach Deal On Syria Chemical Weapons

U.S., Russia Reach Deal On Syria Chemical Weapons thumbnail

Following two days of negotiations in Geneva, this morning John Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov announced they have reached an agreement for a framework on how Syria would destroy its chemical weapons, and would also seek a UN Security Council resolution that would authorize sanctions, but not military action as per Russia’s demand, if Assad failed to comply. The diplomats announced on the third day of intense negotiations in Geneva that some elements of the deal include a timetable and how Syria must comply. At a news conference at the Intercontinental Hotel in Geneva, Kerry said the inspectors must be on the ground by November and destruction or removal of the chemical weapons must be completed by mid-2014.

Ironically, that means that all that “proof” about Assad’s inhuman chemical attacks which demand an immediate deterrence response, apparently does not actually exist despite countless lies to the contrary. The good news is that Colin Powell’s legacy of a war of aggression based on a lie has been halted, if only for now.

AP reports that Kerry said they had agreed on grounds under which they might request a Security Council “Chapter 7” resolution, which could include military and non-military sanctions. Lavrov called the agreements a “decision based on consensus and compromise and professionalism.” But with Russia almost certain to veto any resolution that included military action, Lavrov indicated the limits of using that potential action. “Any violations of procedures … would be looked at by the Security Council and if they are approved, the Security Council would take the required measures, concrete measures,” Lavrov said.

In other words, the military option has been de-escalated, and now it will be merely a diplomatic depabe, made obsolete in the corridors of the world’s most theatrically irrelevant organization, the United Nations.

“Nothing is said about the use of force or about any automatic sanctions. All violations should be approved by the Security Council,” he added.

 

Kerry said any violations will result in “measures” from the Security Council, while Lavrov said the violations must be sent to the Security Council from the board of the chemical weapons convention before sanctions — short of the use of force — would be considered.

 

“We have committed to a standard that says, verify and verify,” he said.

 

Kerry said the pair and their teams of experts had reached “a shared assessment” of Syria’s weapons stockpile and that Syria must destroy all of its weapons.

 

The negotiations between the United States and Russia on securing Syria’s chemical weapons also are considered key to a resumption of peace talks to end the 2 ½-year Syrian civil war.

 

The agreement on a Russian proposal to inventory, isolate and eventually destroy Syria’s chemical weapons stocks comes as the Obama administration warned that there is a timetable for a diplomatic resolution of the weapons issue.

 

A major sticking point was how to account for Syria’s chemical weapons inventory, but in marathon sessions into early morning hours the U.S. and Russia succeeded in narrowing their differences over what each country believes to be the size of the Syrian stockpiles.

And like that the Saudi attempt to enflame the region in a destabilizing conflict has been foiled again, but more importantly Gazpromia has foiled Qatar one more time.

So now we sit back, and await to see where the next false flag attack will strike. Keep a close eye on Iraq. And, of course as usual, Iran and Israel.

zerohedge



11 Comments on "U.S., Russia Reach Deal On Syria Chemical Weapons"

  1. J-Gav on Sat, 14th Sep 2013 7:07 pm 

    Wait and see is the key conclusion here. Wait till the talking heads shut up and have a look at what’s actually been done.

    There are still plenty of people with great influence inside the Beltway who’d just love another ‘nice little war’ to rake in a few million $. Anybody remember who the über-wealthy slime-ball was who said : “I’d gladly trade it all for just a little bit more.”

  2. Arthur on Sat, 14th Sep 2013 8:24 pm 

    Thank God, let’s hope that the situation calms down and war ships sail home. If they can give a Nobel peace prize to Obama, they can give three to Putin.

  3. charmcitysking on Sat, 14th Sep 2013 11:58 pm 

    ^^ C. Montgommery Burns

  4. BillT on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 3:40 am 

    This in not over. Not even close. It will just need another ‘false flag’ and the game is back on. WW3 here we come? 2013? 14? 15? Soon. The Empire needs a big distraction.

  5. GregT on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 4:05 am 

    The world is finally saying ‘no’ to the empire. BillT is correct, the Empire needs something really big this time. Bigger than even the 911 ‘distraction’.

  6. Arthur on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 4:16 am 

    I think Washington backed off because they were afraid of the broad global resistance against the intended war, the too obvious lies and pretexts and the potential triggering point of dumping of the dollar.

    Yes, false flags remain a danger, but Kerry said: “with the internet around it is very difficult to govern”, meaning to manipulate. And that is true. Yesterday italian MP Bernini said in parliament that 9/11 was an inside job. Few people accepted the chemical weapons fabrication. It won’t be that easy for Washington to lie the world again into war. The intentions of Washington are clear for everyone to see.

  7. DC on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 4:46 am 

    I agree with BillT, the mad dogs in the US plans to keep the march to WWIII alive have only been delayed not deferred. Now that President, (a real leader) has given the zionist coporate puppet Obomber a diplomatic bloody nose, Obombers masters are likely furious there timetable has been disrupted.

    Whatever they come with next, will likely be ugly. The US has no choice now but to keep ramping up the atrocities and false flags till they can brow-beat the civilized world into another deadly war.

  8. DC on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 4:46 am 

    Edit:Sorry President (Putin)

  9. GregT on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 5:05 am 

    “Yes, false flags remain a danger, but Kerry said: “with the internet around it is very difficult to govern”, meaning to manipulate.”

    Agreed. Maybe the next attack will be an EMP, perpetrated by the Iranians, that takes down the Internet. They could kill two birds with one stone. Of course there would need to be babies, or children killed as well.

  10. Arthur on Sun, 15th Sep 2013 8:36 am 

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/15/318857/kerry-internet-makes-governing-hard/

    He does not elaborate why the internet makes governing harder because he can’t reveal his real motives.

  11. antiwarforever on Mon, 16th Sep 2013 11:52 am 

    Don’t forget the other mad dog, France’s President Mr. Hollande. Worse than Obama (only doen’t have the same power, that’s all). And the hardly democratic French Constitution even allows him to go to war without consulting the Parliament!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *