Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 9, 2013

Bookmark and Share

UK Energy Secretary Urges Caution about Shale ‘Hyberbole’

UK Energy Secretary Urges Caution about Shale ‘Hyberbole’ thumbnail

UK Energy Secretary Ed Davey has urged caution regarding hype around the country’s burgeoning shale gas industry, warning that the UK cannot rely on shale has to solve its energy challenges during the current decade.

In a speech titled “The Myths and Realities of Shale Gas Exploration” given Monday to The Royal Society, London, Davey said:

“We may have been fracking in Britain’s offshore waters for years. The US may have been fracking onshore for years. But in Britain, fracking for onshore gas in shale, at any significant scale, is something new.

“Nobody can say, for sure, how much onshore UK shale gas resource exists. Or how much of it can be commercially extracted. So let’s be cautious about hyperbole on shale.

“For it would likely be the 2020s before we might feel any benefits in full. So we can’t bank on shale gas to solve all our energy challenges, today or this decade. And in the next decade, shale, by itself, will not come close to solving even our basic energy resource security challenge.”

The comments follow a speech given at the Offshore Europe 2013 conference a week ago by Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne in which Osborne reiterated the government’s intension to support the speedy development of a shale gas industry onshore UK. In that speech Osborne highlight a “generous new tax regime” for shale gas and the removal of bureaucratic obstacles that might hold up the development of the industry.

In his speech today, Davey noted that UK shale gas could be a “key and valuable” resources as part of a more diverse energy mix, sitting alongside conventional gas, wind, wave, biomass, nuclear and carbon capture and storage technologies but that “we won’t know any of this for sure until proper exploration takes place”.

Alluding to recent protests against shale drilling activities in the UK, Davey said:

“So it’s in the national interest to move on from the arguments of zealots and vested interests, and start a debate about how best to proceed safely with shale gas exploration, where we maximize the real positive benefits and minimize the inevitable negative impacts.”

Davey’s speech was, in part, responding to a report from Department of Energy and Climate Change Chief Scienfitic Advisor Professor David Mackay and Dr Timothy Stone, a senior advisor to the Energy Secretary. This reported concluded that the net effect on greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas production in the UK will be relatively small.

In a separate statement Monday, trade body UKOOG (the UK Onshore Operators Group) said that it was “encouraged” that a number of recommendations in the report have already been covered by the industry in its agreed best practice guidelines, which were published in February of this year.

These recommendations include:

  • The need to monitor before, during and after drilling as a matter of standard practice.
  • That operators should plan and then implement controls in order to minimize all emissions and that they should be committed to eliminating all unnecessary flaring and venting of gas and to implementing best practices from the early design stages of the development and by endeavoring to improve on these during the subsequent operational phases.
  • Emphasis should be placed on “green completions” whereby best practice during the flow-back period is to use a “reduced emissions completion” in which hydrocarbons are separated from the fracturing fluid (and then sold) and the residual flow-back fluid is collected for processing and recycling.

UKOOG Chief Executive Ken Cronin commented:

“This report supports the industry’s assertion that environmental impact of shale gas will be significantly less than that of coal and imported gas. It makes sense from an environmental and economic standpoint to continue to reduce emissions to as low as reasonably possible. I welcome this report which echoes much of what we have already stated in our best practice guidelines.”

RIGZONE



4 Comments on "UK Energy Secretary Urges Caution about Shale ‘Hyberbole’"

  1. actioncjackson on Mon, 9th Sep 2013 9:10 pm 

    There’s still money to be made, these guys won’t go away until the collapse fully happens. And then they’ll fade away into nothing and no one will remember why they were so important in the first place.

  2. GregT on Tue, 10th Sep 2013 4:20 am 

    “And then they’ll fade away into nothing and no one will remember why they were so important in the first place.”

    Except for the smart ones, the ones buying up all of the arable land, the railways, and the remote island compounds.

    They’ll still be flying around in Lear Jets, long after the rest of us fade into their backgrounds.

  3. EdithCrowther on Tue, 10th Sep 2013 9:59 am 

    The more energy we access, and the cheaper it is, the faster the destruction of Nature goes – and every single Civilisation that has collapsed in the past has collapsed for that reason, and that reason only. It has exhausted the natural world it is able to access. So OK, now global Civilisation can access the whole World – so it is going to destroy the whole of Nature, not just one area.

    The main result of cheap energy is a world of 7 billion people, which has made the word “sustainable” a joke word that cannot be used by anyone with any common sense. Nothing can ever be sustainable again, so long as cheap energy allows humans to destroy living things with power tools on a scale not seen before except in calamities like volcano eruptions, meteorite strikes, and Ice Ages.

    The only thing any nation can do to survive, is cut right back on its dependence or addiction to cheap energy – and that means either halving its population for most nations, or living like cavemen but even that won’t work because the Nature on which cavemen relied has gone already. So it means halving the population. Nothing else matters. No theory, or policy, or idea, or hope, has any meaning when there are too many people and their source of food is suddenly removed. And nearly all our food depends on fossil fuels in some way. Even those insects they want us to start eating.

  4. BillT on Tue, 10th Sep 2013 2:20 pm 

    Edith, we don’t have to live like cave men, just intelligent humans. Look around you and count how many things you own that are NOT necessities. Things that do not even make your life more safe and comfortable. If you are like most Americans, you have ‘stuff’ that you never or rarely use or even see.

    Then there are the malls and big box stores. How much of that ‘stuff’ count disappear and never be missed? 90%? 95%?

    No, we could cut back 50% and never miss it. Maybe even 75% or more. Just say “NO!” to that purchasing impulse when you go to the store. Remember, they put the impulse items where you see them before you check out … They make billions on those items alone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *