Page added on August 15, 2013
Crude oil is far from being one homogenous substance. Its physical characteristics differ depending on where in the world it’s pulled out of the ground, and those variations determine its usage and price.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) puts it succinctly: “not all crude is created equal.” Some has a lot of sulphur, and it’s called sour. Oil with less sulphur is called sweet. Crudes also vary in how dense they are. Sweet, light crude is the most valuable type of oil. Sour, heavy oil fetches the lowest prices. Here’s why:
This is partly because gasoline and diesel fuel, which typically sell at a significant premium to residual fuel oil and other ‘bottom of the barrel’ products, can usually be more easily and cheaply produced using light, sweet crude oil. The light sweet grades are desirable because they can be processed with far less sophisticated and energy-intensive processes/refineries.” (EIA)
Depending on these characteristics, crude ends up at different refineries:
Refining capacity in the Gulf Coast has large secondary conversion capacity including hydrocrackers, cokers, and desulfurization units. These units enable the processing of heavy, high sulfur (sour) crude oils like Mexican Maya that typically sell at a discount to light, low sulfur (sweet) crudes like Brent and Louisiana Light Sweet. Many East Coast refineries have less secondary conversion capacity, and in general they process crude oil with lower sulfur content and a lighter density. (EIA)*

The refining process itself—fractional distillation, followed by further reprocessing and blending—is how we extract from crude to create the different petro-products that we use:
Crude oil is made up of a mixture of hydrocarbons, and the distillation process aims to separate this crude oil into broad categories of its component hydrocarbons, or ‘fractions.’ Crude oil is first heated and then put into a distillation column, also known as a still, where different products boil off and are recovered at different temperatures. Lighter products, such as butane and other liquid petroleum gases (LPG), gasoline blending components, and naphtha, are recovered at the lowest temperatures. Mid-range products include jet fuel, kerosene, and distillates (such as home heating oil and diesel fuel). The heaviest products such as residual fuel oil are recovered at temperatures sometimes over 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit. (EIA)*
That’s the rough overview of how crude gets from the ground to the gas station. In recent years, new extraction methods have made more crude available.
Due to controversial techniques pioneered in the natural gas industry and high oil prices providing incentives for oil companies, more oil is being extracted from previously unviable fields. Estimates of US proven reserves have risen as a result:
In 2011, oil and gas exploration and production companies operating in the United States added almost 3.8 billion barrels of crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, an increase of 15 percent.” (EIA)

This has also led to a turn-around in US oil production, which, according to a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), may even exceed Saudi Arabia within five years. Kevin Bullis at the MIT Technology Review summarizes some of the key figures:
US production had fallen from 10 million barrels a day in the 1980s to 6.9 million barrels per day in 2008, even as consumption increased from 15.7 million barrels per day in 1985 to 19.5 million barrels per day in 2008. The IEA estimates that production could reach 11.1 million barrels per day by 2020, almost entirely because of increases in the production of shale oil, which is extracted using the same horizontal drilling and fracking techniques that have flooded the US with cheap natural gas.
Energy researcher Vaclav Smil suggests in The American that these developments should mean the end of “peak oil” anxieties:
Obviously, there will come a time when global oil extraction will reach its peak, but even that point may be of little practical interest as it could be followed by a prolonged, gentle decline or by an extended output plateau at a somewhat lower level than peak production.
But others like journalist Chris Nelder argue that we’ve increased spending on oil production by tremendous amounts only to see global oil production edge up a bit. Older, cheaper oil fields are declining, and their oil is being replaced by crude from far more expensive sources. Nelder made his numerical case to the Washington Post like this:
In 2005, we reached 73 million barrels per day. Then, to increase production beyond that, the world had to double spending on oil production. In 2012, we’re now spending $600 billion. The price of oil has tripled. And yet, for all that additional expenditure, we’ve only raised production 3 percent to 75 million barrels per day [since 2005].
And Bryan Walsh at Time notes that, while expanded oil production will be good for the economy and the trade balance, it doesn’t mean the US will be insulated from global crude prices:
The one thing politicians most want is the one thing the US still won’t be: energy independent. That’s because no matter how much additional oil the US is able to pump in the years to come, the global oil market is just that—global. Oil is the ultimate fungible commodity, able to be shipped and piped around the world.
5 Comments on "What’s in Crude Oil and How Do We Use It?"
actioncjackson on Thu, 15th Aug 2013 8:02 pm
Politicians don’t want energy independence most. That’s just what they tell the ignoramuses composing the public in order to boost their spirits. In reality they want money and power, and the prolonging of the current societal arrangement for as long as possible so they can live happy lives until the system collapses.
DMyers on Fri, 16th Aug 2013 12:55 am
The Chris Nelder embedded quotation is the best part of the article. when you look at the larger picture, it seems there’s little yield from a huge investment.
The assay chart is okay. Gasoline boils in a range below the boiling temperature of water. The heavy stuff is cranking up to a thousand degrees. I ain’t no rocket scientist, but I think the energy input to reach a thousand is a good bit more than what it takes to reach 185. Which is to say, the lower the oil grade the greater the quantity of energy required for its refinement.
Which brings me to all this unconventional oil. Missing from the article is an assay comparing unconventional oil with conventional oil. At any rate, all the unconventional is thrown into the same barrel as conventional. They simply raise the bar that contains both.
As the assay indicates, all oil is not equal. There is the sweet and there is the sour. The unconventional oil, thrown together as it is, still is not oil. It’s not real oil, and it’s not going to act like real oil.
Thus we have a stock called syn crude. They’re openly admitting that this is synthetic crude. It’s counted right along with the genuine and expected to produce the same results.
The dialog needs to take this into account. All oil is not equal. Unconventional oil should be treated as a separate category, in the interest of transparency.
BillT on Fri, 16th Aug 2013 1:10 am
Technically, the asphalt in the street/road in front of your house could be recovered and refined and provide billions of barrels of oil. (There are some 18 billion tons of asphalt paving in the US.) Now as to what the EROEI would be, I have no idea, but is it any different than the tar sands?
GregT on Fri, 16th Aug 2013 4:42 am
News flash from 2025:
We have 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil left in North America, in our highways, roads, and parking lots.
DMyers on Fri, 16th Aug 2013 2:54 pm
LOL
Or, how about
News flash:
The Senate will vote this week on whether we will have fuel for our cars or roads on which to drive them, which has come to be known as the “Lose/Lose Act.” Senator Smith from Tennessee is arguing for a third option of, “using the precious little petroleum we have left for the ‘car vaccine’ recently developed at MIT.” The vaccine damages certain portions of the brain to destroy all memory and recognition of the once ubiquitous automobile.
Senator Jones of Ohio is leading the opposition to the vaccine. Jones wants to keep roads for their historical value and argues, “there’s not a brain in America left to damage.” Jones is an advocate for a company in his district which is selling a new technology called “brain fracking” which promises to unlock previously unrecoverable intelligence located in the brain stem by blasting the brain with a high pressure, proprietary blend of undisclosed chemicals.