Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on August 1, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Peak shale oil? What peak?

Peak shale oil? What peak? thumbnail

 

A graphic contributed by Jean Laherrere indicating that shale oil production in North Dakota may soon peak and start declining.

This figure, made by Jean Laherrere, deals with oil production from the “Bakken Shale,” a geological formation existing in large part in North Dakota. Shales may contain oil deposits, in most cases in the form of “tight oil.” This is oil is trapped in a porous matrix which cannot flow to the surface without the help of sophisticated fracking technologies (you can find a nice illustration of the process here). The recent revival of oil production in the United States, which gave rise to so much optimism on the future of oil production, is almost solely related to use of these technologies for the exploitation of the Bakken Shale.

The problem is, of course, for how long it will be possible to maintain the rapidly growing production trend from the Bakken deposits. In the figure, Laherrere shows the oil production in North Dakota (ND prod) in thousands of barrels per day (kb/d) as well as the number of exploration rigs (nb rigs). Laherrere has also shifted the rigs curve forward of about one year, in order to match the production curve.

Now, it is clear that you cannot produce anything that you haven’t previously found. So, it is well known that production in a certain area mirrors exploration, but it is shifted forward in time. With conventional oil, the time lag between discoveries and production is of the order of 30-40 years. With oil from shales, it seems to be much faster: wells are rapidly put into production but also have a short lifetime.

In the figure, Laherrere finds a time lag of just around one year. And, since we see a drop in the number of exploration rigs in 2012, it seems likely that production will start declining soon, perhaps during the present year.

This is a conclusion that has to be taken with caution since the drop in the number of exploration rigs could be just a temporary phenomenon. But it is also true that the exploitation of shale oil is expensive in terms of resources and energy required. In the end, as always, it is a question of EROEI: we can only have the oil we can afford to extract.

On this subject, see also a post by Stuart Staniford on the Bakken Shale production that arrives to conclusions similar to those of Laherrere. See also a post of mine which examines shale gas production using the same method. See also an extensive article by Jean Laherrere on the recent trends of oil production.

cassandra’s legacy



3 Comments on "Peak shale oil? What peak?"

  1. rollin on Thu, 1st Aug 2013 12:56 pm 

    A more detailed graph would be needed to see what has happened this past year. Oil production has only gone up about 6% in the first 5 months of the year, while it rose 40% in 2012. Looks like the production rise might be flattening out. Need another six months of data to see any real trend though.

    Some of the drop in rigs may be due to a concentration on fracking, with more fracking zones per horizontal well. This raises the cost of fracking but also increases the output. There are also about a thousand wells that have not been brought into production yet.

  2. BillT on Thu, 1st Aug 2013 3:40 pm 

    When they stop importing oil, THEN I will believe that fraking might be good. On second thought … it can never be good.

  3. sparky on Thu, 1st Aug 2013 11:46 pm 

    .
    The mix of drilling rig might have changed too .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *