Page added on July 14, 2013
The discovery is a sign that Saudi Arabia has prepared for the possibility that Iran will become a nuclear power, and it’s a reminder that a decades-long truce between Saudi Arabia and Israel is just that, and not a peace treaty, one analyst says.
Saudi Arabia has built missile launch pads that target both Iran and Israel with ballistic missiles, according to imagery and analysis by IHS Jane’s, the British security consultancy.
While IHS Jane’s analysts did not see actual missiles, the sites include command and control facilities and underground bunkers that likely conceal missiles and launchers nearby, said Allison Puccioni, a senior image analyst at IHS Jane’s.
The discovery is a sign that Saudi Arabia has prepared for the possibility that Iran will become a nuclear power, and it’s a reminder that a decades-long truce between Saudi Arabia and Israel is just that, and not a peace treaty, says Michael Rubin, an analyst at the American Enterprise Institute who briefs members of the U.S. military on Iran.
The Saudis’ “predominant fear is that Iran will become a nuclear power,” Rubin said. “They’re showing they’re serious.”
Puccioni said one site, at Al Watah, is about 5 years old and others were apparently build in the mid-2000s. They resemble missile launch sites in China built for the Dongfeng-3 (DF-3), a medium-range missile that can launch a 4,700-pound payload with a range of 1,600 miles. The DF-3 launches from trucks known as transporter erector launchers (TELs).
“We’ve not seen the TELs but the entire area has drive-in bunkers.” she said. “How far it goes into the mountain I can’t tell you, but it’s wide and tall enough to accommodate a transporter erector launcher.”
IHS Jane’s analysts concluded that unlike two previously-known sites at Al Sulayyil and Al Jufayr, the new site at Al Watah has a different layout than previously known missile bases and that the new site “potentially serves as a training and storage complex with the ability to perform operational missile launches as required.”
Launch pads at the new site also bear markings on the ground that point in the direction of Iranian and Israeli targets, they said.
“Saudi Arabia is likely to begin re-arming its missile stock with more modern and accurate Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles (IRBMs),” said Robert Munks, deputy editor of IHS Jane’s Intelligence Review.
Former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal said in 2011 that his country would purchase “off the shelf” nuclear weapons if Iran developed its own supply. “For such short notice, the foundations for both nuclear-capable launch vehicles and for acquiring the warheads will need to be laid in advance,” Munks said.
Kenneth Pollack, a senior fellow in the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, said the Saudis started buying ballistic missiles from China in the 1980s at a time when Iran and Iraq were warring with similar weapons. The Saudis maintain the weapons as a deterrent to Iran, Iraq and Israel, its chief rivals in the region, Pollack said.
The most significant aspect of the IHS Jane’s analysis is what it does not show, Pollack said: The review did not find that Saudi Arabia is investing in new missile capability to counter a growing threat from Iran.
“These are really old missiles,” Pollack said. “Wouldn’t you want faster, better missiles if only to send a message to the Iranians?”
Rubin says Saudi Arabia’s current alliance with the United States and its truce with Israel should not be taken for granted because the monarchy leadership is in flux.
The succession to the Saudi throne passes from brother to brother, and many of that generation are now in their 80s. “Each king may last a year or so if not less,” Rubin said.
And among the 3,000 or so princes, there are pro-Western moderates such as Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, as well as others who dislike the United States and lean toward radical ideologies, Rubin said.
“Anyone looking at this structure must recognize that what seems safe today could pose a tremendous threat in the future,” Rubin said.
6 Comments on "Saudi missile sites target Iran, Israel"
Plantagenet on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 6:03 pm
Obama has failed to keep Iran from nuclear. He is equally unlikely to keep Saudi from going nuclear.
Shaved Monkey on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 11:39 pm
Who was at the wheel when Israel went nuclear?
BillT on Mon, 15th Jul 2013 2:19 am
Shaved, sssshhhh. You are not supposed to notice the double standard. ^_^
DC on Mon, 15th Jul 2013 2:40 am
Good thing the puppet ‘Obama’ has no mandate to stop Iran from pursuing peaceful nuclear energy, wrong-headed though the idea itself may be. If Iran were building solar, then I am sure the US of Lies would find something else to hang on Iran. Notice how the US has kind of dropped the whole Iran\Terrorism angle? The US of Terror figured the nuclear boogeyman is more scary than the fake Iran=terror boogeyman. But that what it is to live in nation built on lies, right Plant? Every week is a new lie, each one less plausible than the last.
This latest clumsy set of lies is frankly, embarrassing. In case you have’nt been keeping score, Iran has been a ‘year’ away from a ‘nuke’ since the 1980s’. So was Iraq, strangely enough. Seems the only priority in the ME is to squander vast resources those nations don’t have on weapons systems that don’t work and would be for all intents, useless.
GregT on Mon, 15th Jul 2013 5:19 am
Come on everyone, chant with me, O-bam-a, O-bam-a, O-bam-a.
My God, when will people ever wake the fuck up!
Arthur on Mon, 15th Jul 2013 8:47 am
“Who was at the wheel when Israel went nuclear?”
You mean in the US?
He was not at the wheel, but instead bleeding to death at the backseat, an event strongly connected to the fact that Israel wanted to go nuclear, which he had opposed vehemently.
Today the Rubins and Pollacks of the world, mentioned in the article, determine the politics of the US, not Irish like the Kennedy clan (all murdered) or the Buchanans.
If the Iranians are foolish enough to go nuclear (which I strongly doubt), the Saudi US satraps could let themselves be used as a launchpad for hired missiles, acquired on the ‘free market’ to do the dirty work for Washington, all for the survival of the ‘House of Saud’, where in reality the Muslim Brotherhood is more in line with the aspirations of the ‘man in street’ and correctly perceived as a threat by the rulers of the ME. It also shows that it is wrong to see all developments in the ME as 100% explained by Sunni-Shi’ite rivalry, although that does indeed exist. But once segregated, the newly formed Sunni Caliphate and Shi’ite Iranian empires of the future will NOT be arch enemies, the real common enemy will be US-UK-Israel (for the duration of the existence of the latter three).
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/morsi-arrives-in-tehran-in-first-visit-by-egyptian-leader-to-iran-in-decades-1.461644