Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 21, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Apartment Energy Use Drops Nearly 40 Percent

Consumption

If you live in an apartment building with five or more units, you probably use significantly less energy than your friends living in single-family homes.

Maybe you have suspected this, because your apartment is so much tinier than most people’s houses (which is certainly the case for this reporter) and therefore uses less energy. Or perhaps you already pat yourself on the back regularly for being an urbanite who lives efficiently, from taking public transportation and using bike shares to unplugging electronics and community composting.

But something else is also going on. Sure, the average home uses more energy than an apartment because of size. Also, apartments generally have fewer windows and outside walls.

But many apartment dwellers rent instead of own, and therefore they should fall into the split incentive problem where the owner is not incentivized to make energy-efficient upgrades because the tenant pays the electricity bill. However, it appears that the split incentive issue has not prevented significant gains from happening.

apartment energy use

Even without substantial energy efficiency upgrades in multifamily buildings, the per-household energy use in larger apartment buildings has fallen 38 percent since 1980, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The change in energy for heating is even more significant for this housing class, with a drop of nearly 50 percent.

Other home types have also seen decreases, mostly from efficiency improvements in major appliances, but larger houses offset the gains, so it’s essentially a slight increase for single-family homes over the years. But the graph above shows why the bulk of home energy management companies focus on single-family homes and not multifamily units. Single-family still makes up the bulk of housing stock in the U.S. — and clearly that’s where the most gains in efficiency can be made in a single home.

Some companies, such as WegoWise, are addressing the energy needs of multifamily units. Because of the split incentive issue, multifamily is not quite the same beast as single-family properties and has to be approached differently. But for those that can crack the nut, it could be a $3.4 billion energy efficiency opportunity, according to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

Successful solutions could be the ones that target the pain points of some of the largest urban areas with the oldest — and least efficient — housing stock. ThinkEco, for example, has a solution to control window air-conditioners, which are prevalent in older homes everywhere and in cities such as New York and Philadelphia that have a lot of old buildings. Another problem, which startup Radiator Labs is tackling, is how to cheaply retrofit old steam heaters that give off so much heat that some users are forced to leave their windows open in winter.

There will be many winners and losers in home energy management in coming years, but tailored solutions for the increasing number of apartment dwellers are a niche only a few have tackled. Thirty percent of new homes in 2012 were multifamily buildings with more than five units, the highest rate since 1986. The offerings may also have to be regional, as seven of the most densely populated urban areas are in California, and the fastest-growing cities are in the South.

green tech media



5 Comments on "Apartment Energy Use Drops Nearly 40 Percent"

  1. BillT on Fri, 21st Jun 2013 3:41 am 

    Most of the housing in the US is cardboard and paper. The insulation is often minimum or missing. The windows leak air both ways, there is no thought to location (north/south) when the house is built. The same stick-built is found in every one of the Lower 48. Much of it was built in the late 1800s or early 1900s, before insulation was used. Single pane windows, uninsulated pipes, etc.

    Then again, if ALL appliances with ‘standby’ features were totally turned off, the power use would drop significantly. Maybe by 20-30%. That means turning them off at the power source, not the off switch on the gadget. How many clocks do you need? Do you really need ‘instant on’ when you turn on your TV or computer? No, of course not. We can cut our energy use significantly by just using our thought processes which are basically free.

  2. Others on Fri, 21st Jun 2013 3:44 am 

    Condos are ideal way for home ownership and also better use of land. But the Home owner Association fees are quite high. This should be lowered.

  3. DC on Fri, 21st Jun 2013 5:06 am 

    Kind of stating the obvious and acting like its a revelation of some sort. Its not exactly ‘news’ that apartment-style buildings are on balance more energy efficient that single-family suburban matchstick and sawdust shacks. Apartments cant help but be more energy efficient than houses. Course, our apartment\condo buildings are mainly built just as shoddy as our houses, same guys build em both after all. A more accurate description would be, apartments are somewhat less wasteful.

  4. Plantagenet on Fri, 21st Jun 2013 5:07 am 

    People who own houses tend to be richer than people who rent apartments. Its not surprising their electrical use would be higher.

  5. Kenz300 on Fri, 21st Jun 2013 12:21 pm 

    Saving money on your energy bills is something that home owners and apartment dwellers should both want to do.

    Something as simple as changing to LED light bulbs or turning your thermostat back when you leave your home can make a difference in your monthly energy bills.

    Why give money unnecessarily to your local utility when you can spend it on you or your family.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *