Page added on June 14, 2013
Red state or blue state, liberal or libertarian, Americans share an addiction to rare-earth elements imported from China.
Green technologies such as electric cars, wind turbines, solar panels and fluorescent light bulbs rely on rare-earth metals. The military depends on rare earths for guided missile systems, satellites and unmanned drones. NASA’s spacecraft carry powerful rare earth magnets to Mars and outer space. The magnets also miniaturized iPads, computers and high-tech headphones.
China controls 95 percent of the world’s rare-earth supply. The key to this monopoly isn’t an abundance of rare-earth deposits, but its expertise in processing ore into oxides and pure metal. The ore tends to carry uranium and thorium, the most radioactive element on the planet, and extracting the metal is typically a long, multistage process involving toxic chemicals.
“We know where the deposits are. Having them end up in your iPhone is not a straight or simple process,” said Brad Van Gosen, a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Denver.
A few years ago, China showed its power, and cut the supply of rare earths to a trickle. The move sent the United States and other countries scrambling to end their reliance on China. Prices soared, drawing new investors and mining companies into the rare earth market. Now, the United States has one new mine nearly finished and two more in the permitting stages. But the crucial element in escaping China’s rare-earth rule isn’t new mines, it’s rebuilding the expertise and infrastructure to process the finicky metals, experts say.
Price war
In 2010, China spiked the cost of rare-earth elements when it started restricting exports and charging foreign companies higher prices. The price bubble sparked a worldwide frenzy to escape China’s control. A new Australian-owned processing plant just opened in Malaysia. Others are planned in Canada, Europe and Africa. Several companies are also trying to develop an American supply for rare earths, some with support from the Department of Defense. [Infographic: Energy-Critical Elements to Watch]
“The rare earths are very much strategic metals, and particularly very much of strategic importance to the defense industry,” said Curt Freeman, president of Avalon Development Corp. in Fairbanks, Alaska, a mining consulting firm. “There’s a queasy feeling in Congress and the Department of Defense,” he said.
In the United States, California’s Mountain Pass mine reopened in 2010 and is expected to start producing light rare-earth elements this year. The mine was once the world’s biggest producers of rare earths, but shut down in 2002 because of environmental problems and falling prices. Another mine is proposed in Wyoming, by Canadian company Rare Element Resources, but faces opposition from local residents.
Alaska’s newest resource
One of the biggest rare-earth gambles is at Alaska’s Bokan Mountain. Once mined for uranium, the granite peak on Prince of Wales Island contains rich veins of the harder-to-find heavy rare-earth elements. The project has strong support from Alaska’s legislature and from nearby communities. A Canadian company plans to extract the ore and transform it into oxides with a custom-built processing plant. Therein lies the challenge.
Despite their name, rare earths are actually common in Earth’s crust, though in low concentrations. The moniker is a holdover from the 19th century, when researchers discovered the oddly named elements in rarely found minerals. The 17 elements share a close affinity, with similar chemical properties and atomic weights. Bokan Mountain is one of the few spots on Earth with a bounty of heavy rare-earth elements, which have higher atomic weights. It’s especially elevated in yttrium, which appears in everything from cubic zirconia and car pollution sensors to lasers, rockets and jet engines.
Because rare earths are often all mixed together in one rock, separating the heavy rare earths usually requires removing the lighter ones first. This is typically done with a series of chemical tanks and solvents. Plus, there’s the radioactive uranium to dispose of. But mine owner Ucore says it has a new solid-extraction technology that greatly simplifies this process. The technique relies on nanotechnology to remove impurities and concentrate the heavy rare earths into oxides, according to Ucore. The Department of Defense funded Ucore’s ore extraction research with a contract in October 2012.
Costly withdrawal
But a USGS-funded study found Bokan Mountain’s vein system is very complex, with a mix of at least two dozen ore minerals, the agency’s Van Gosen said. The study was published Jan. 22 in the Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences.
“It’s getting more and more complicated the more we look at it,” Van Gosen said.
Metals industry consultant Gareth Hatch notes that processing is the biggest hurdle for rare-earth mining companies.
“Processing is the key challenge for deposits that particularly are skewed toward the middle and heavy rare earths, because they have some unusual minerals that haven’t been processed before,” said Hatch, founding principal of Technology Metals Research. Hatch is helping develop a rare earth processing company in Canada.
The USGS has several ongoing projects examining the geology of Bokan Mountain, to better understand how the minerals appeared.
“The idea is to develop a fundamental understanding of how these deposits get started in the first place in Earth’s crust, and use it to go look for resources that the U.S. public needs,” said Susan Karl, a USGS geologist based in Anchorage.
Ucore board member Jaroslav Dostal, an emeritus professor at Saint Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, was lead author of the Bokan Mountain study. The grant program that provided funding for the study, the USGS Mineral Resources External Research Program, has awarded projects to private industry and foreign recipients in the past.
Investing in processing
The USGS also has projects exploring the geology of other rare-earth deposits. Since 2010, the House of Representatives has introduced legislation to curb mining regulations and fund rare-earth research and development, which have yet to pass the Senate. Recycling of rare-earth metals, which is not always made possible with high-tech gadgetry, is another way to reduce dependency on China’s supply. Earlier this year, the Department of Defense recommended stockpiling $120 million of critical heavy rare-earth elements. But industry experts say money would be better spent on building American expertise and infrastructure in processing rare earths. [The Common Elements of Innovation]
“In terms of full-blown capacity, Molycorp [in California] does have its light rare-earth separation facility, but other than that, there is really nothing in North America,” Hatch, the industry consultant, said.
“The capability to process and convert [rare earths] from minerals into compounds that go into high-tech equipment is the key bottleneck not just in the U.S., but also the world,” he said.
7 Comments on "Radioactive Mountain is Key in US Rare-Earth Woes"
GregT on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 12:49 am
And the Rare Earth elements suffer from the same economist’s flawed idiologies.
They too will run out.
dave thompson on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 3:14 am
My guess is china has lax laws when it comes to processing these materials. Once the rest of the world gets up and running china will come back with cheaper metals and undercut every one.
BillT on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 4:22 am
dave, you could be right. It appears that whatever we manage to recover and process, is going to be much more expensive than the Chinese stuff.
There is a financial war going on between the West and the East, even if few realize it or see the shots fired. But, so far, the East is winning. Western money printing is taking the dollar, Euro and Yen into the trash bin of history. China is building it’s mountain of gold, as are most other non-Western countries. The US cannot even prove that it holds any gold, and gold is the new money.
Arthur on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 8:41 am
Although China currently has a near monopoly on rare earths, there are other large deposits, like Brasil:
http://deepresource.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/brasil-has-rare-earths-in-abundance/
…or the bottom of the Pacific. CBCNews:
“Here is another recent discovery concerning rare earths. It turns out that those elements are so abundant on the bottom of the ocean that the mud covering just one square kilometre of ocean floor in the Pacific Ocean could supply one-fifth of the current annual world consumption, according to a new study published online Sunday in Nature Geoscience.”
DC on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 9:00 am
What a shyt article. None of the supposed rationales for mining RE’s hold up to much scrutiny. All those wonderful magical ‘techs’ that require those RE’s are all made in friggen CHINA and Japan! With the singular exception of weapons, all the nifty goodies on the list are either made wholly, or majority in Asia\Europe.
Here is a list of techs the US either does not make, or only has a token industrial base for.
EVs(no really, we just pretend to)
Ijunks
Laptops
Uhhh..high-tech phones?..for what?..eavesdropping on people? probably made in Asia as well.
There are 2 main regions in the world that actually have the industrial and skills base to make anything worthwhile with RE’s. Europe and the Asia region. The only thing the US really needs RE’s for are weapons, since thats all the US knows how to make anymore. Only an amerikan would be annoyed China has so much of the RE market, they also happen to need the stuff to make all our I-craps and other disposable tech-toys we love so much.
The other thing that makes amerikas bleating about RE less credible is, while RE are critical for the designs of the stuff we ‘consume’, they are nowhere near close to the majority of the composition. An Ijunk might need a few ounces of REs or w/e a unit-but the majority of those techs mass is not RE. So even if RE cost goes up-its hardly a deal breaker for manufacture or end user. If an I-crap were 98% RE by weight-then it might make some difference-but they are not, not even close.
The real issue, as usual, is amerika does not like paying fair-market price for key commodities, preferring rigged markets it controls with artificially low prices for amerikan corporations to further pad there bottom lines. Thats all the RE bugaboo is all about.
DR on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 2:32 pm
DC, I’d like to add that REs are also an integral part of refining oil into gasoline, etc. I wonder what percent of the world RE market goes to this as compared to other uses such as the electronics or cell phones?
BillT on Fri, 14th Jun 2013 3:01 pm
Arthur, deposits do NOT equal usable resources. Frak oil was not usable until $100 oil came along. If oil prices dip below 80$ Frak oil will go away too. If China can mine and process rare earths at say $1,500. per kilo (current prices) The coat in the US may be #3,000. per kilo. That makes everything they are used in more expensive.
DC, you are on the right road. Most, if not all, components for I-toys come from Asia, and probably China. We would have to build a factory to make them here and compete with China prices. Not going to happen. China industry is government owned and run. They do NOT have to sell at a profit to survive.
They have the US by the big ones and are getting ready to squeeze. We cannot even make more weapons systems if they cut off supply.