Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on April 22, 2013

Bookmark and Share

UAE: ‘Days of Easy, Cheap Oil are Gone’

Production

The United Arab Emirates is planning to get up to 25% of its power from nuclear energy by 2021 as it looks to reduce its domestic reliance on fossil fuels and ensure it has enough oil to export as its economy expands, the country’s new energy minister said Monday.

“Nuclear energy is expected to account for between 20% to 25% of power production by 2021 through the operation of four nuclear power plants,” Suhail Al Mazrouei told an energy event in Abu Dhabi.

U.A.E. is also planning to up its production capacity to 3.5 million barrels per day by 2017 from around 3 million barrels per day, said Mr.Mazrouei, who was appointed oil minister last month in a cabinet reshuffle aimed at accelerating the pace of economic development in the Gulf state.

Mr.Mazrouei said the days of easy, cheap oil are gone and finding new discoveries is becoming difficult and costly, while global oil demand will increase by one million barrels per day until it reaches 105 million barrels per by 2030.

Emirates Nuclear Energy Corp., or ENEC, last year secured permission to construct two nuclear power units–the first in a string of civilian power plants planned in the Persian Gulf region. The firm is building the nuclear plants in the Gulf state, a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, and said in March it has applied to the country’s nuclear regulator for a license to build a third and fourth nuclear reactor in the western area of Abu Dhabi.

Several Gulf states, including top oil exporter and fellow OPEC member Saudi Arabia, are looking at nuclear power after failing in recent years to develop enough gas production to meet their rising electricity demand, especially during the summer when use of electric-powered air conditioning soars.

The U.A.E, which produces around 2.6 million barrels per day of crude, is one of the world’s top five power consumers per capita. Currently, around 80% of the country’s power is generated from burning natural gas, while the rest comes from oil, which the Gulf state wants to preserve for lucrative crude exports.

ENEC signed in August contracts worth $3 billion with six international companies, including Russia’s Tenex, Rio Tinto PLC and France’s Areva SA, to supply nuclear fuel, conversion and enrichment services for its four South Korea-designed advanced pressurized water reactors. Each of the four planned reactors is capable of producing 1,400 megawatts of electricity.

The contracts, which cover the first 15 years of the reactors’ operations, will provide ENEC with long-term security of supply, and favorable pricing and commercial terms, the company said. ENEC said it expects to return to the market again when conditions are favorable to strengthen its supply position.

ENEC has already started construction of the first unit in Barakah, in western Abu Dhabi, and is expected to start building its second reactor this year.

The U.A.E. is investing billions of dollars in developing alternate sources of energy as part of plans to diversify its economy away from hydrocarbons. Its planned nuclear reactors are set to be the first in a string of civilian power plants in the Middle East, potentially including Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Unlike nearby Iran, the U.A.E. is committed to not enriching uranium itself nor reprocessing spent fuel.

Hamad al-Kaabi, the Gulf state’s national representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, has previously said that the U.A.E. hasn’t yet finalized a strategy for managing spent fuel from the reactors, but a national waste strategy document is in advanced stages of negotiation.

RIGZONE



5 Comments on "UAE: ‘Days of Easy, Cheap Oil are Gone’"

  1. GregT on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 2:16 pm 

    Short term gain, for long term pain.

    The last thing that we should be doing on this planet, is to be building more nuclear power reactors. There are already more than 440 on the Earth, and we can’t figure out how to contain them even in times of energy surplus, and economic stability. WHEN we run out of cheap and easy fossil fuel energy, and our economies have finally gasped their last breaths, 440 Chernobyls, and Fukushimas should pretty much finish off whatever is left of the human race.

  2. DC on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 3:23 pm 

    So lets see if we got this straight. The UAE agrees cheap and easy days of oil are gone, so the best way to deal with that, is to build the most expensive complex and toxic form of energy ever devised. AND while they are doing that, they actually plan to INCREASE the export of its non-renewable FF that do remain, thus insuring that the days of cheap and easy oil end asap, to help pay for the nukes, I guess.

    I like the throw-away line about somehow this idiotic plan is somehow different from Iran. Yes, the difference is the UAE is a US\UK puppet state, Iran is not. So nukes are the UaE are a-ok, but not for Iran of course. And I see Rigporn even took the time to mention they have ZERO plans for dealing with the waste from these un-built white elephants, they shouldnt feel too bad about that, no one else has a strategy either.

  3. Norm on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 3:45 pm 

    Its all about the rich greedy corporations, cause they get to sell them the nukes. These will be typical ‘water filled’ reactors where the water limits the reaction (slow neutrons) producing little energy but huge amounts of waste. Standard nuclear power attains a ‘burnup’ of only approximately 3% (leaving 97% of the energy in the fuel rod). A pebble bed reactor has a better burnup of perhaps 30%. So they wont build a pebble bed reactor, cause why would they build something that produces more energy and less waste. That would be the last thing you would want to do if you were a greedy rich corporation.

  4. Norm on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 3:48 pm 

    Since the reactor produces 3% energy and 97% waste, where do all the nearly-new-looking, “spent’ fuel cartridges go? They go into a ‘spent fuel pool’. There is far more fuel in the ‘spent fuel pool’ than there is in the reactor. The reactor has a hundred backup systems, the spent fuel pool has none. The radiological catastrophe of a meltdown in the spent fuel pool is well understood. It would be 200 Fukushima’s all at once. This is why there are no safety safeguards on the spent fuel pool. Why would you want that? They almost had the first spent fuel pool fire, at Fukushima. Even now there isn’t any backup. And that spent fuel pool still has 97% of its energy in the rods. Proof of your useless government, that such a worthless arrangement is ever allowed, and when it is exported, it allows those greedy rich corporations to show increased profits for a couple of fiscal quarters.

  5. Kenz300 on Tue, 23rd Apr 2013 12:26 pm 

    Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous…

    We need to learn from the disasters at Fukishima and Chernobyl. Those disasters continue today with no end in sight.

    The costs and environmental damage will continue FOREVER.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *