Page added on January 3, 2013
Europe’s high energy costs are driving increasing numbers of industries and large employers overseas. Most of Europe’s high energy costs are caused by Europe’s reflexive flight from inexpensive energy of the hydrocarbon and nuclear varieties.
High energy costs are emerging as an issue in Europe that is prompting debate, including questioning of the Continent’s clean energy initiatives. Over the past few years, Europe has spent tens of billions of euros in an effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
“We embarked on a big transition to a low-carbon economy without taking into account the cost and without factoring in the competitive impact,” says Fabien Roques, head of European power and carbon at the energy consulting firm IHS CERA in Paris. “I think there will be a critical review of some of these policies in the next few years.” _NewYorkTimes
Carbon dioxide is boogeyman #1 for the European greens who control much of the continent’s energy policy. But Europe’s ineffectual attempts to reduce carbon emissions amount to suicidal self-flagellation and self-strangulation. It is all grand theatre, with the end result being self righteous self-immolation.
Boogeyman #2 is nuclear power. Germany is the poster boy of sacrificial self-castration in this regard.
The changes have been rapid. Nuclear power supplies 17 percent of the country’s energy needs, down from 23, while renewables have climbed from 20 to 25 percent in just months.
…Despite technological advances, wind, solar, hydro and other green energy sources still remain an unprofitable investment in a fair market. The way to encourage their exploitation is through a set of feed-in tariffs, a policy where energy companies are forced to buy electricity from green generators at a price set by the government (which is usually legislated to remain the same for two decades).
The German government has passed the cost of the payment from the energy companies to the consumer… This week, energy companies announced that the charge would go up by 47 percent for next year. The average Germany household will now pay €250 a year to sponsor green energy producers, four times more than in 2009. _RT
But green energy is expensive and unreliable. Which means that big industries whose profit margins depend upon the use of inexpensive energy, must move overseas — and take their good paying jobs with them.
On Dec. 19, Voestalpine, an Austrian maker of high-quality steel for the auto industry, announced that it would build a plant in North America that would employ natural gas to reduce iron ore to a kind of raw iron that would then be used in the company’s European blast furnaces.
…Energy-intensive industries like chemicals and steel are, if not closing European plants outright, looking toward places like the United States that have lower energy costs as they pursue new investments.
BASF, the German chemical giant, has been outspoken about the consequences of energy costs for competitiveness and is building a new plant in Louisiana.
“We Europeans are currently paying up to four or five times more for natural gas than the Americans,” Harald Schwager, a member of the executive board at BASF, said last month. “Energy efficiency alone will not allow us to compensate for this. Of course, that means increased competition for all the European manufacturing sites.” _NYT
Europeans have unwittingly handed their futures over to saboteurs in high places. Green government officials and their advisors are pushing European economies over a cliff, for the sake of faux environmental fear mongering. They are running from the energy boogeymen, and in the process are destroying the economic futures of their people.
Europeans are no longer living in a democracy, but are being controlled by a non-representative quasi-feudal system known as the European Union, based in Brussels. And the EU is essentially in thrall to the faux environmental power interests.
With such suicidal leadership, it is no wonder that demographic projections show most European populations rapidly withering away.
The future of Europe rests in the hands of her people, although Europeans have not been noted historically for understanding that fact — except for the popular uprisings against communist governments in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
And there is very little time.
5 Comments on "Europe Exhausting Herself Running From Energy Boogeymen"
Kenz300 on Thu, 3rd Jan 2013 10:00 pm
The cost of oil, coal and nuclear keeps rising.
The cost of wind and solar keeps dropping.
Around the world investments in alternative energy sources continues to grow.
Those industries tied to the past are fighting the transition. It will happen.
Climate change is real.
DC on Fri, 4th Jan 2013 1:42 am
Al Fin…Lol!
deedl on Fri, 4th Jan 2013 7:52 am
One of the main reasons for growing trade deficits of the PIIGS in the last decade was growing cost for importing coal, oil and gas. Replacing them by renewable sources is a major part of balancing the trade deficit and stabilizing the economy.
Furthermore homegrown green electricity lowers the risks of volatile fossil fuel prices and crisis in the oil producing regions. So it disconnects local economies from global crisis.
But the fossil drug dealers need their customers to stay hooked to the needle, so of course the make huge efforts to tell every dumb journalist on the planet how stupid it is to shift to alternative energies.
And because Europes, as the artciel says, lies in the hand of the people, the are taking their future back from the large energy companies. Villages build their own biomassplants, farmers their own windturbines, houseowners their own pv-panels and cities buy back their grids. The energy revolution is not done by greens, it is a grassroot citizen movement.
BillT on Fri, 4th Jan 2013 9:52 am
If they can cut their energy use to 10-15% of what they have now, renewables will help to keep the lights on and the materials moving. But, more than 20% is NOT going to happen, ever. There are no renewables other than growing plants and muscle power.
Feemer on Fri, 4th Jan 2013 3:12 pm
we cannot pamper the economy any longer with cheap or dirty hydrocarbons, the environment is changing, if we discard renewables because it is uneconomical then we will see more droughts, more heat waves, less snow, which means less water for a growing population, pretty soon we won’t have enough food or water, then it doesn’t matter how good or bad the economy is.