Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on October 12, 2012

Bookmark and Share

New oil sheen in Gulf worries BP

New oil sheen in Gulf worries BP thumbnail

The Gulf of Mexico oil spill is causing new headaches for BP and has prompted coastal communities and members of Congress to call for more oversight from the U.S. government.

Confirmation that an oil sheen reported last month is consistent with oil from BP’s blown-out Macondo well comes at a crucial time, just as talks intensify about resolving penalties and fines from the disaster in April 2010.

Scientists have said that residual oil from the well and the wreckage of the Deepwater Horizon rig and equipment on the seafloor that was used to cap the well could be dredged up for months and years to come.

The Sept. 16 discovery of the sheen, which the U.S. Coast Guard confirmed late Wednesday, correlated to oil from BP’s Macondo well, has renewed attention and concern.

“As bad as the spill was and as great as a catastrophe as the Deepwater Horizon explosion was, I don’t think we can underestimate anything,” Orange Beach, Ala., Mayor Tony Kennon said Thursday.

U.S. Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts, a top Democrat on the House Committee on Natural Resources, is calling for a full undersea survey of the Macondo site to be carried live on the Internet so independent scientists can see what is going on. A camera focused on the gushing well after the April 20, 2010, disaster, and when a massive cap halted the flow almost three months later.

“One can only hope that the nightmare well has not come back to haunt the people of the Gulf,” said Markey, a frequent oil industry critic.

Scientists say that the find is not surprising, even more than two years later, especially if the oil is coming from the equipment on the seafloor.

“It’s like after a ship sinks, it continues to leak long after it sinks,” said George Hirasaki, a Rice University engineering professor who was involved in oil containment efforts after a Shell platform in the shallow-water Bay Marchand field caught fire off Louisiana in the 1970s, killing four workers.

BP, meanwhile, has been in on-and-off talks over the last year with the Justice Department and others about resolving remaining claims and addressing civil and criminal fines and penalties.

BP could face up to $21 billion in fines related to Clean Water Act violations alone, but it has been seeking to reduce its exposure by settling for a smaller figure and getting cement contractor Halliburton and rig owner Transocean to contribute some of the money.

No deal soon

While talks continue between BP and the Justice Department, several people briefed on the situation say they don’t expect an announcement on a deal before the November election. BP also likely would want to make another run at its partners to see whether they are willing to share in paying for any settlement that is reached, and has not had such discussions with Transocean and Halliburton for months, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Halliburton and Transocean have argued they are not liable for damage from the well, and a court ruling in February bolstered their position.

BP has spent or committed tens of billions of dollars to clean up damage and compensate victims, and the total amount it pays could balloon when fines and penalties are factored in.

The company has reached a proposed class action settlement covering individuals and businesses claiming health and economic damages, but that deal doesn’t cover fines and penalties.

The new oil sheen in the Gulf has given all the players something new to think about.

May not be active leak

A statement from the Coast Guard on Wednesday gave no indication of any active leak. It said the source of the sheen is uncertain but could be residual oil associated with debris left on the seafloor after the disaster.

BP said Thursday it believes the oil came from equipment associated with the blown-out well and not the well itself. It said it has been working with the Coast Guard and other government officials to investigate the source of the oil. The company said flights over the area and vessel surveys suggest that the integrity of the cap on the Macondo well and the associated relief well are sound.

“The size of the sheen, its persistent point of origin and other factors indicate the most likely source is the bent riser pipe that once connected the rig to the well head, where a mix of oil, drilling mud and seawater were trapped after the top kill operation,” BP said.

The top kill, which involved pumping material into the wellhead, was an early, unsuccessful attempt to stop the flow.

Matt Dundas of the environmental group Oceana said the news about is troubling.

“Here we are, two years and 5 million barrels of spilled oil later, and we’re still dealing with BP’s inability to keep oil out of the ocean,” he said.

Eleven rig workers were killed when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and, according to the government, more than 200 million gallons of oil was discharged.

Houston Chronicle



9 Comments on "New oil sheen in Gulf worries BP"

  1. BillT on Fri, 12th Oct 2012 12:35 pm 

    Wait until there are oil sheen on the rivers of America and in the tap water of the frak field. You ain’t seen nothing yet. The Pres will soon sign a special order making it illegal to sue oil or natural gas companies. Wait and see. Protests are already illegal.

  2. DC on Fri, 12th Oct 2012 12:53 pm 

    Amerikan and UK oil are pretty much exempt from liabilities *now*. They can start wars, kill, dump poisons at will, from Africa to Alabama, make govts dance like puppets to their tune. If the US figurehead president were ever to sign such an order, it would only formalize a situation that de-facto, all-ready exists. I really would honestly like to see BP pay an actual claim, with ITS money, not tax-payer subsidized back door deals. Dont be at all surprised, if behind the scenes, BP is asking for the 20-50 billion needed from the USgov itself. Be a drop in bucket compared to all the QE-fraud going on atm.

  3. Pythor Sehn on Fri, 12th Oct 2012 3:06 pm 

    I find it amusing that red states would be calling for more government oversight.

  4. Arthur on Fri, 12th Oct 2012 3:35 pm 

    “make govts dance like puppets to their tune.”

    The Bush administration WAS oil:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CAV111A.html

    In fact the rise and geopolitical dominance of Anglosphere over the past 150 years was strongly correlated with the discovery and exploitation of oil, before anybody else did and hence had a headstart. And it is likely that the geopolitical preeminence will vanish when oil runs out.

  5. BillT on Sat, 13th Oct 2012 1:00 am 

    Arthur, I think the race is on between peak oil and peak debt. Either or both will be the end of our way of life here in the West. But, you know that. Too bad a few on here cannot see the cliff for the blinders and rose colored glasses.

  6. DMyers on Sat, 13th Oct 2012 2:46 am 

    BP is guilty. But they don’t like being guilty. They just want an out.

    Big contributors get an out.

    Therefore, BP will get an out, and everyone else will get an in….the rear.

  7. Arthur on Sat, 13th Oct 2012 10:33 am 

    Bill, I fear that shale has indeed the potential to postpone the end of the petro age with a decade or two, resulting in even more global warming as well as an outright irreversable poisened soil. It could even postpone the financial collapse that almost inevitable will come with the end of economic growth for ever. And it will enable more population growth, making the final crash even more horrific. I am afraid that long term thinking is a trait of only a few Cassandras, with no impact on the behavior of the vast majority.

  8. BillT on Sat, 13th Oct 2012 11:58 am 

    Arthur, I really hope we do NOT have years before it all goes down the toilet. I don’t think our species will survive the recovery/burning of the last drop and cf. of hydrocarbons. Not even close.

  9. Kenz300 on Sun, 14th Oct 2012 12:08 am 

    And all Republicans in Congress can say is we need more deregulation. Now they want to end the EPA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *