Page added on September 20, 2012
A scrambled-up material has broken the record for converting heat into electricity. Findings published today in Nature suggest that disorder may be the key to creating a new generation of energy-harvesting technologies1.
Laptop owners and car mechanics alike know that heat is a major by-product of any kind of work. In power stations, for example, only one-third of the energy that goes into the generator comes out as electricity — the rest radiates away as ‘waste heat’ before it can turn a turbine.
For decades, physicists have toyed with ways to convert heat into electricity directly. Materials known as thermoelectrics use temperature differences to drive electrons from one end to another. The displaced electrons create a voltage that can in turn be used to power other things, much like a battery. Such materials have found niche applications: the Curiosity rover trundling about on the surface of Mars, for example, uses thermoelectrics to turn heat from its plutonium power source into electricity.
Nature‘s Geoff Brumfiel discusses the research with Mercouri Kanatzidis.
Thermoelectrics are not, however, efficient enough to be used everywhere. Existing technologies can turn only 5–7% of heat energy into electricity, much less than the conversion efficiency of technologies such as solar panels.
Building a better thermoelectric depends on finding materials that conduct electricity, but not heat. According to Mercouri Kanatzidis, a chemist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, the way to do that may be to introduce disorder into the materials’ structure.
Kanatzidis and his team began with one of the most well-known thermoelectrics: lead telluride (PbTe), which usually has an ordered lattice structure. The researchers scattered in a few sodium atoms to boost the material’s electrical conductivity, then shoved in some nanocrystals of strontium telluride (SrTe), another thermoelectric material. The crystals allowed electrons to pass, but disrupted the flow of heat at short scales, preserving the temperature gradient.
The final step was to stop heat flow over longer scales. To do this, the team created a fractured version of their pretty thermoelectric crystal. The fracturing did the trick: the cracks allowed electrons to move but reflected heat vibrations in the crystal. The material had a conversion efficiency of about 15% — double that of normal PbTe thermoelectrics.
“This is a significant advance,” says Jeff Snyder, a materials scientist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. In recent years, other teams have made nanostructured materials with efficiencies close to the latest work, but the Kanatzidis group’s effort is the highest yet. Snyder says that the group’s approach of introducing disorder is clearly the way to increase efficiency. “What they’re describing is what we modern thermoelectricians believe is the perfect thermoelectric,” he says.
That doesn’t mean that the material is ready to be used on the next Mars rover, Snyder adds. The sodium introduced to make electrons move is highly reactive, and can degrade the material, particularly if it accumulates along the fractures designed to stop heat flow. NASA has been looking at similar approaches for future space missions, but the agency is not yet convinced that the approach is ready for launch, he says.
Kanatzidis is more optimistic. “I think the materials that we have today are good enough for applications,” he says. “My belief is that in about two to three years we will have something.”
7 Comments on "New material breaks record for turning heat into electricity."
Norm on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 1:39 am
gotta see it actually working. compare to solar panel, better or worse? where is the beef. otherwise it just researcher welfare.
SOS on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 1:56 am
If these materials are used to convert waste heat they may have some value.
DMyers on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 2:40 am
“My belief is that in about two to three years we will have something.” [Quoting from a quotation in the principle article.] Well, then wait two or three years, and when you have something, write an article about it.
In the meantime, you might also try turning cow shit into gold. Alchemy never dies.
Arthur on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 8:38 am
Mr. Kanatzidis has a wife, two kids and a mortgage. His family expects him to bring home the Armani, eh the bacon, so he is ‘confident’ that something will come out of it. This is no to suggest that mr. K. should not be allowed to continue his research as long as society can afford to fund it. But I am afraid that this kind of technology might very well not have to potential to scale to the extent that power station waste heat can be turned into electrickery.
DC on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 9:48 am
As much as I find basic research fascinating, over the last few decades, I ve lost count of how many articles Ive read about interesting sounding research that goes exactly….nowhere. Now maybe it could be some of that research is locked away for being too upsetting to the status-quo,but most likely just dont scale, too expensive, or some other esoteric reason why we never hear from them again. Much of our research being taken over by for-profit corps hasnt helped one bit. They often conduct ‘research’ solely for the purpose of de-railing genuine progress, not encouraging it.
I think of ive lost count of how many times, breakthroughs in research are about to end the energy crisis, the transportation mess, and 100 other intractable problems. Yet the world I see out my window has barely changed in decades,and every single problem has only gotten worse, not better, despite incremental ‘improvements’.
My home, the gas-burning trash bins on the roads, the power out of the wall, all exactly the same as two and three decades ago. But the fuel and power keeps getting more expensive and the rate of blackouts is slowly increasing. So much for progress….
BillT on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 10:52 am
EROEI. Nuff said.
kervennic on Thu, 20th Sep 2012 8:01 pm
This is a complicated material and a compliated technique that will not have wide applicaton relevant for energy.