Page added on September 1, 2012
Limiting animal agriculture is not a healthy, sustainable way to save water. In a recent paper, the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) recommends that the world population save water by reducing the consumption of animal products by 75 percent. This recommendation is based on flawed data.
Meat, milk and eggs are important sources of protein and other nutrients. Apart from dietary necessity, animal agriculture also promotes environmental sustainability and the quality of cropland through the use of manure as a soil nutrient and pastures and rangelands through grazing.
The SIWI paper assumes that livestock are raised on land where rainfall could water crops instead. In reality, much of the land used for livestock grazing is too hilly or dry to support crops. According to Dr. Steve Washburn, animal science professor and extension specialist at North Carolina State University, grazing animals on pasture allows farmers to make the most of marginal land.
Data from the USDA Economic Research Service show that in 2007, less than nine percent of pastureland was productive enough to be classified as cropland. In countries like Ireland and New Zealand, even more farmers rely on non-crop land for livestock grazing.
Many farmers have good reasons when they do raise livestock on cropland.
“It is part of a rotation so you are not continually cropping the same crop on the same land,” Washburn said.
Rotating animals between fields helps protect crop health. Manure from grazing animals also improves soil quality. Dr. Jude Capper, an adjunct professor of animal sciences at Washington State University and independent sustainability consultant, disagrees with the SIWI report. Capper said raising fewer animals would make it harder to fertilize crops.
“The fewer animals we have, the less fertilizer we have,” said Capper.
Management of livestock and crops in a sustainable, responsible fashion means more food for the growing world population.
There are many ways to save water in agriculture. Scientists today are working to reduce food wastage and develop more drought-tolerant crops. Reducing water use is vital, but the world cannot afford to go without animal agriculture.
5 Comments on "Should the world go vegetarian? Scientists say “no”"
DC on Sat, 1st Sep 2012 10:42 pm
Cattlenetwork, clearly an un-biased source. Funny they mention manure and fertilizer. I thought indust-ag prefer chemicals and petroleum as fertilizer. If animal manure is such a great source of it, why scientists keep saying the growing dead zones around the world are largely a result of run-off from industrial farms. And that ‘run-off’, largely consists of, you guessed it…
Manure. Kind of like this article.
Animal rotation? Really? I heard of crop rotation, not that industrial farms practice that, but animals?? There all kept head to hip in industrial feel lots and pens. Most of them are so fat and weak from there treatment they can barely rotate themselves…
Kenz300 on Sat, 1st Sep 2012 11:18 pm
Maybe the problem is that there are too many people and too few resources. Endless population growth has put a strain on all the worlds finite resources.
BillT on Sat, 1st Sep 2012 11:29 pm
I seem to remember when farms managed to be profitable with small fields, horsepower and a few milk cows, pigs, chickens, etc. Beef was a rarity on the table. Chicken and pork/mutton was the meat choices. I think we will slowly ALL become at least semi-vegetarians and meat will be a treat for special occasions.
kpeavey on Sat, 1st Sep 2012 11:43 pm
Reach across the table and try grabbing the meat off my plate. GO AHEAD, I DARE YOU.
There are better methods of raising meat than CAFOs and battery farms. Manure from medicated, tainted crop fed animals is unsuitable for use in improving soil fertility. The contaminants destroy the soil microbes. Industrial agriculture is destructive and this article is overthinking it.
csatadi on Sun, 2nd Sep 2012 9:54 am
Until there will be effective demand for meat, milk and eggs there will be animal husbandry.