Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 4, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Tanzania: Controlling Population Growth Vital for Meaningful Economic Growth

Tanzania: Controlling Population Growth Vital for Meaningful Economic Growth thumbnail

ECONOMISTS observe that countries across the globe with fast population growth rates are likely to continue to suffer from poverty even if their economies are growing steadily.

Reports issued by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) show that Tanzania’s economy is growing on an annual average of 6.4 per cent while the country’s population growth is on an average of 2.9 per cent per annum.

As the country prepares for the next population census, there is concern that more effort is required to manage the fast growing population to accelerate meaningful economic growth.Recently, Members of Parliament listened to the National Development Plan for 2012/2013 during the seventh meeting of the 10th Parliament and some of the members were up in arms against what they termed as the government’s omission of funding reproductive health in the development plan.

Members of Parliament warned that continuously ignoring reproductive health in development plans aggravates the problem of failing to plan and cater for the growing population.The Chairperson of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Community Development, Ms Jenister Mhagama, MP for Peramiho noted that failure of the economy to change people’s lives shows that the government is not doing enough to manage and control population growth.

“It is high time we put more efforts in controlling population growth and the government should ensure that family planning services are easily accessible,” she charged. Ms Mhagama, who is also the chairperson of the MPs group for safe motherhood, said failure to manage population growth is costly because the government has to spend more resources on maternal health care services delivery.

Under normal circumstances when the population growth continues unchecked, the chances are that many people do not access quality social services such as education and economic opportunities, thus the government spends more money providing these services.

Mhagama argued that allocation of funds towards family planning would profoundly reduce expenditure on social services as a smaller population would reduce demands on government for the services. Quoting the 2007 UNFPA report on population trends, the MP said investing one US Dollar per person per year on reproductive health could save the government 49 US dollars per person annually which could be used for other social services.

Mr Albert Ntabaliba (Manyovu-CCM) noted that it is not enough for the government to point out challenges of fast population growth without suggesting the way forward. “When you talk of a 2.9 per cent annual population growth rate without telling the people whether or not to reproduce or plan their families better does not help anyone,” he argued.

He was also of the view that the government should seriously address the matter and ensure that population is manageable. Ms Mary Mwanjelwa (Special Seats – CCM) challenged the government over conflicting figures concerning reproductive health. She said while the main goal of the five-year development plan is to reduce maternal deaths to 175 for every 100,000 births, the Long Term Perspective Plan which ends in 2016 aims at reducing maternal deaths to 220 per 100,000 births.

“These figures are conflicting, they must be rectified or else we will lose direction,” she warned. Responding to the reactions by MPs, the Executive Secretary of the President’s Office, Planning Commission, Dr Philip Mpango, said there was need to control population growth for the economy to grow sustainably.

He, however, noted that many of the contemporary family planning methods were not acceptable in many societies due to cultural beliefs. “Cultural beliefs make it difficult to introduce some of the modern family planning methods that help to control population growth,” he added. Dr Mpango said girls should stay longer in schools including tertiary institutions as a way of reducing the number of births per woman.

Birth control is an umbrella term for several techniques and methods used to prevent conception. Birth control techniques and methods include contraception, the prevention of fertilisation, contragestion and abortion which is the removal or expulsion of a fetus or embryo from the uterus which according to Tanzanian laws is illegal.

Contraception includes barrier methods, such as condoms or diaphragm, hormonal contraception, also known as oral contraception and injectable contraceptives. In Tanzania, only 34 in 100 married women give birth to an average of six children each in rural areas as compared to three babies in urban women.

Thirty women in 100 in rural areas want to use at least one form of family planning methods but cannot access the services; this number has increased from 24 in every 100 women in 2005. Unfortunately, from reasons ranging from poor maternal health care to having too many children too soon, maternal mortality rate has remained high at 454 in every 100,000 live births.

Family planning saves the lives of women and babies and contributes to the nation’s socio-economic development. Tanzania is one of the 189 nations that endorsed the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in September 2000, as part of the internationally agreed-upon development goals at the General Assembly of the United Nations which targets, among other things, the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality including increased access to family planning. Problems facing family planning in developing countries, Tanzania included, are inadequate political support and funding for family planning services.

AllAfrica.com



7 Comments on "Tanzania: Controlling Population Growth Vital for Meaningful Economic Growth"

  1. BillT on Fri, 4th May 2012 3:24 pm 

    Condoms and the right for women to demand them…but that won’t happen in a male ruled world. Especially where manhood is judged on how many kids you can make.

    Why is it the males fault? Well…

    Women can have maybe 30 babies in their lifetime if they are very strong and prolific.

    But a male can father many tens of thousands in his life time buy having sex, or millions in the lab, and the limits are only on the number of females he has access to.

  2. dsula on Fri, 4th May 2012 3:54 pm 

    As long as most babies die, having lots of them is not a problem. Stop medical aid!

  3. Kenz300 on Fri, 4th May 2012 4:05 pm 

    Never ending population growth is not sustainable and only leads to more poverty, suffering and despair. Family planning services need to be available to anyone that wants them. If you can not provide for yourself you can not provide for a child.

  4. Cabra1080 on Fri, 4th May 2012 6:13 pm 

    The whole world is in a population overshoot and here one country is having great difficulty subduing population growth. To be a healthy, sustainable place, the earth needs around 500 million people, max. Yet population keeps growing. The means and technology for meaningful family planning has been around for decades, yet the “conservative”, man-ruled countries of the world continue to suppress it. What a lark!

    It would be nice if women could be given the means to plan their families rather than wait for Mother Nature to come in and start culling the human population – it won’t be pretty when that happens.

  5. Kenz300 on Fri, 4th May 2012 9:29 pm 

    Every country needs to develop a plan to balance its population with its resources of food, water, energy and jobs. Those that do not will be exporting their populations. Access to family planning services will reduce poverty, suffering and despair.

  6. Lisa on Sat, 5th May 2012 9:08 am 

    “To be a healthy, sustainable place, the earth needs around 500 million people, max.” Who told you that, David Rockefeller or one of his six children? Rick Santorum or one of his eight children?

    Look at the waste you are producing and the resources you are consuming in the rich part of the world – then look at the same number for the poor part of the world. Then do the math.

    And as it happens, Tanzania has a landmass that can easily support its population.As opposed e.g. The United Kingdom.

    Maybe the earth can’t support more than 500 million obese, diabetic, homeshopping future cancer patients but it’s hardly fair to chuck that problem on the back of the the thirld world.

    Also, pay attention to the heading – “…Meaningful Economic Growth” is that why we were put on this earth?

  7. Arthur on Sun, 6th May 2012 3:24 pm 

    Kenz300 says: “Those that do not will be exporting their populations. Access to family planning services will reduce poverty, suffering and despair.”

    Well, these countries might want to try to ‘export’ their populations, but I can assure you that other countries will not be keen on ‘importing’ them. If the life boats are full, people will hit with paddles on the hands of those who will try to get in the boat as well. There is much opposition to illegal immigration in the US and there is much more opposition in Europe, even to the degree that every European country now has it’s own anti-immigration party. And the tensions between different groups are increasing every year. And when the economic shtf, these groups will clash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *