Page added on April 12, 2012
The monthly trade data was reported this morning and you will see press reports about the nominal trade deficit. But I like to look at the real trade data as it gives a better feel for the economic impact of trade. The real trade deficit is improving and the balance in February was $44,148 million ( 2005 $) as compared to $48,294 million ( 2005 $) in December. I am
comparing the February to December because in the real GDP accounts they compare the change over the quarter versus the quarterly average for most of the economic series in the accounts.
This looks like a nice gain and implies that trade will make a nice contribution to first quarter growth.
But to understand what is happening to the trade data you need to look below the surface at some of the details. We are really seeing a structural change in the US energy environment because of falling domestic demand and expanded output from fracking. For the first time since oil became a major issue in the 1970’s we are starting to see a real possibility that over the next decade the US could really achieve energy self sufficiency. Drill, Baby, Drill is no longer just some silly political
campaign slogan. The US probably will not actually achieve energy independence, but we should reach the point where we only import energy from other North American sources. The US can
eliminate its direct dependence on Mideast oil. It is already starting to happen and on a net basis US real oil imports have been cut almost in half from their 2005 peak.
US petroleum exports, or reexports are now equivalent to roughly a third of gross imports. Part of this is due to the current transportation bottlenecks that have created a surplus of oil in the interior and lead to West Texas Intermediate oil trading about $20/bbl cheaper than Brent crude.
This is giving the Gulf Coast refiners a major competitive edge in world markets for refined oil products. But is also becoming a major political issue over the Keystone XL Pipeline. The pipeline would allow Canadian Tar Sands oil to flow to the Gulf Coast refiners. Of course, oil is fungible and if Canada exports their oil from their own ports it would have the same impact on world oil supply and demand and oil prices would be about the same as if the Keystone pipeline is built. The pipeline would benefit the US, but most of the political claims are grossly exgerated.
Oil is now making a major contribution to the improving US trade deficit, but even without oil the trade balance is improving.
Even US non-petroleum exports have been surging. But much of the surge is just the snap back
from the plunge in trade during the Great Recession. Real exports growth of non-petroleum products is slowing rapidly as the year over year growth rate has slowed to about 5% as compared to a peak rate of almost 20%. in 2010.
Real non-petroleum imports are showing a similar trend where growth has slowed to about 5%
as compared to a peak growth rate of 30% in 2010. Of course, imports are larger than exports so if they both grow at the same rate the trade deficit would widen.
3 Comments on "Oil and the Real US Trade Deficit"
DC on Thu, 12th Apr 2012 11:06 pm
I wonder does saying there deficit is 44,148 million just sound better than 44.1 billion? BI can keep hopeing ‘North American’ sources will feed the gaping amerikan maw, but it will have to remain just that, a hope. Canada and the US dont have anyting like 9million spare Bpd to sell to amerika at artifically low prices(thanks Nafta). Even if 100% of alberta is tore up it wont do the job.
Besides, why do so many amerikans continue the believe the incredible idea that the US wants to get ‘off’ ME oil? Nothing could be further from the truth. The US loves being in the ME and creating enemies. They are there to prevent the ME from makeing its oil available to the BRICS, to keep the Euro, or anyone else from challenging Petro-dollar hegemony. No amerikans dont want to get ‘off’ ME oil, or even out of the ME. The US empire would collapse inside of a year or two at most if they did. Amerikas puppet states would be overthrown and the ME would start selling oil on its terms-not New York or Londons. They will only leave when they are defeated or simply cant afford to be there anymore. Not before.
BillT on Fri, 13th Apr 2012 2:17 am
BI is full of BS! The Us will only be ‘self sufficient’ in energy when we are no longer using it for anything but true necessities. That means after personal cars are history, A/C goes back to the wealthy few and you have to take a train anywhere you want to go because commuter airlines are gone.
BillT on Fri, 13th Apr 2012 2:26 am
Dc, you are correct. It is NOT about oil, it’s about the Us dollar as the world reserve currency. If oil is allowed to be sold for anything but Us dollars, the Empire is over. Ask Saddam or Gaddafi…ooops! They tried and look what happened to them and their countries. Same is the real problem with Iran. Even if we were still the largest oil producer in the world, the Empire would still have to control oil countries for the same reason.