Page added on January 30, 2012
The world is running out of time to make sure there is enough food, water and energy to meet the needs of a rapidly growing population and to avoid sending up to 3 billion people into poverty, a U.N. report warned on Monday.
As the world’s population looks set to grow to nearly 9 billion by 2040 from 7 billion now, and the number of middle-class consumers increases by 3 billion over the next 20 years, the demand for resources will rise exponentially.
Even by 2030, the world will need at least 50 percent more food, 45 percent more energy and 30 percent more water, according to U.N. estimates, at a time when a changing environment is creating new limits to supply.
And if the world fails to tackle these problems, it risks condemning up to 3 billion people into poverty, the report said.
Efforts towards sustainable development are neither fast enough nor deep enough, as well as suffering from a lack of political will, the United Nations’ high-level panel on global sustainability said.
“The current global development model is unsustainable. To achieve sustainability, a transformation of the global economy is required,” the report said.
“Tinkering on the margins will not do the job. The current global economic crisis … offers an opportunity for significant reforms.”
Although the number of people living in absolute poverty has been reduced to 27 percent of world population from 46 percent in 1990 and the global economy has grown 75 percent since 1992, improved lifestyles and changing consumer habits have put natural resources under increasing strain.
There are 20 million more undernourished people now than in 2000; 5.2 million hectares of forest are lost per year – an area the size of Costa Rica; 85 percent of all fish stocks are over-exploited or depleted; and carbon dioxide emissions have risen 38 percent between 1990 and 2009, which heightens the risk of sea level rise and more extreme weather.
The panel, which made 56 recommendations for sustainable development to be included in economic policy as quickly as possible, said a “new political economy” was needed.
“Let’s use the upcoming Rio+20 summit to kick off this global transition towards a sustainable growth model for the 21st century that the world so badly needs,” EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said in response to the report, referring to a U.N. sustainable development summit this June in Brazil.
ACTION
Among the panel’s recommendations, it urged governments to agree on a set of sustainable development goals which would complement the eight Millennium Development Goals to 2015 and create a framework for action after 2015.
They should work with international organizations to create an “evergreen revolution,” which would at least double productivity while reducing resource use and avoiding further biodiversity losses, the report said.
Water and marine ecosystems should be managed more efficiently and there should be universal access to affordable sustainable energy by 2030.
To make the economy more sustainable, carbon and natural resource pricing should be established through taxation, regulation or emissions trading schemes by 2020 and fossil fuel subsidies should also be phased out by that time.
National fiscal and credit systems should be reformed to provide long-term incentives for sustainable practices as well as disincentives for unsustainable ones.
Sovereign wealth and public pension funds, as well as development banks and export credit agencies should apply sustainable development criteria to their investment decisions, and governments or stock market watchdogs should revise regulations to encourage their use.
Governments and scientists should also strengthen the relationship between policy and science by regularly examining the science behind environmental thresholds or “tipping points” and the United Nations should consider naming a chief scientific adviser or board to advise the organization, the report said.
4 Comments on "World lacks enough food, fuel as population soars"
MrEnergyCzar on Mon, 30th Jan 2012 8:07 pm
Oil has enabled an extra 5 billion people to live and eat.. Less oil equals less people..
MrEnergyCzar
DC on Tue, 31st Jan 2012 5:55 am
Mmmm if 3 billion dont get you know, fed, like this article suggests, wont they uhhhh…starve? As opposed to fall into poverty? I know thats what will happen if I dont eat, regardless how much money I have in the bank.
How is it this entire arcticle implies there too many people, yet totally skates around the idea theres too many mouths. And treats this as if its a issue that can be ‘solved’ with economic reforms? Bizzare…
Dave Holloway on Tue, 31st Jan 2012 11:59 am
I have been trying to circulate an idea I had a few years back, that so far appears not to have made it to the main stream.
I studied eco design to degree level and so have quite an understanding of the problems facing us in the near future. Now I have watched the efforts of the establishment to be come greener, but being virtually in poverty in a first world developed county I am sometimes forced to improvise.
Anyway, my discovery falls under the low hanging fruit catagory, and involves this.
Given that approximately half the worlds staple diet is rice, and the usual cooking method involves boiling the rice continuosly for 15 miniuts, I found, [when my gas credit expired] that if I put the measure of rice into a thermos flask, boiled a cup full of water however. Put this into the flask and left it to stand for an hour. I ended up with perfectly cooked rice.
Obviously the time taken needs to be found by experimentation depending on make an model of flask, portion size, and I no doubt height above sea level etc.
But this has three obviously benefisual
effects.
Far less energy it used whatever the fuel source.
Far less water is used, and probably more nutrition retained.
Far less heat, poloution, and water vapour into the environment.
The draw backs involved are you need a thermos flask of some discription, and adiquate size. Most families in my part of the world allready have these sat in the garage, waiting on the decadel picknic.
And dinners ready three quaters of an hour later.
It may be an opportunity for a charitable organisation to help impoverished peoples around the globe,
but if it became the standard cooking method for rice, and no doubt some other suitable food stuffs the savings and benefits would be enormous.
I do hope this makes it into the mainstream eventualy, and perhaphs attracts promotion from a more prominant person or organisation.
Bogey.
Kenz300 on Wed, 1st Feb 2012 8:22 pm
Too many people and too few resources…
The endless world population growth is not sustainable. It only adds to the poverty, hunger and despair of the worlds poorest people.