Page added on December 2, 2011
biofuels release greenhouse gas emissions through land conversion like deforestation. But an innovative new study by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) published in Ecology and Society has computed how long it would take popular biofuel crops to payoff the “carbon debt” of land conversion. While there is no easy answer—it depends on the type of land converted and the productivity of the crop—the study did find that in general soy had the shortest carbon debt, though still decades-long, while palm oil grown on peatland had the longest on average.
Looking at three different types of biofuels in six countries, the study found that soy grown in parts of Brazil would require 30 years to make-up its carbon debt, which is as good as it gets. Palm oil would require 59-220 years, while jatropha would require 76-310 years, depending on the type of land that was converted. But even at its lowest estimate palm oil replacing peatlands would require just over two centuries (206-220 years) to break even. This means, hypothetically, that palm oil established over drained peatland during Napoleon’s invasion of Russia would still be paying off its carbon debt today.
“It really matters how you produce biofuels and what land you grow it on as to whether you are going to get climate change benefits,” said Louis Verchot, CIFOR scientist and co-author of the study. “Biofuels that result in the conversion of natural ecosystems are never going to be emission efficient. This study argues for appropriate spatial planning and being aware that anything that you do in the name of the atmosphere could have unanticipated consequences unless you look at the whole production system.”
The study found that these three biofuel crops could only be deemed sustainable if grown on permanent crop or pastureland that was not already in use for growing foods, i.e. was degraded or abandoned, in order to prevent leakage.
“In the current reality, these restrictions would leave only a small potential window for sustainable biofuel production aimed at reducing CO2 emissions given the limited availability and/or productivity of these land uses,” the authors write. In other words, on a planet of 7 billion, its becoming nearly impossible to find available land that fits sustainable criteria.
5 Comments on "Carbon debt for some biofuels lasts centuries"
BillT on Sat, 3rd Dec 2011 2:04 am
Food to fuel is the idea of fools.
Kenz300 on Sat, 3rd Dec 2011 2:21 am
Second generation biofuels are the future of the biofuel industry. They are made from algae, cellulose and waste. The world produces a lot of trash every day. That trash can now be turned into biofuel, energy (methane gas) and raw materials for new products. Using MSW – Municipal Solid Waste as an input helps to turn a liability into an asset. A much more sustainable solution to a growing problem of providing energy and reducing the need for more landfill space.
Mike on Sat, 3rd Dec 2011 11:28 am
Yawn. A 38 page study with no other purpose than to frame bio-fuel production as a carbon balance sheet. Guess what? No one else cares. Oil will be pumped and burned, coal will be mined and fired, bio-fuel will be grown and expended.
Carbon mitigation schemes will get no more than a nod and a wink in the end. The AGW herd needs to understand this: if their theory is right, it will happen. It is inevitable. China will not shutdown its coal plants for a dubious theory. Ships will not hoist sails to assuage bellowing children. Militaries will not forgo air power in unilateral altruism. And people, all people, will use what ever fuel can be drilled, dug, fracked, pumped, piped, refined, grown, harvested, fermented and BURNED.
Inevitable.
BillT on Sat, 3rd Dec 2011 12:26 pm
Mike, I think you are correct. Humans are not going to make sacrifices for the future. And no, biofuels are NOT going to ever go anywhere. Bio fuels are not a net increase in energy, they just use oil to make less efficient forms of fuels. Not one bio fuel set-up will last beyond the end of oil. Or taxpayer support.
BillT on Sun, 4th Dec 2011 3:32 am
Take a look at this and then we will discuss “renewables”.
http://sunweber.blogspot.com/2011/12/machines-making-machines-making.html