Page added on November 9, 2011
The International Energy Agency warned Wednesday that the world is hurtling toward irreversible climate change and will lose the chance to limit warming if it doesn’t take bold action in the next five years.
In its annual World Energy Outlook, the agency spelled out the consequences if those steps aren’t taken and what needs to be done to cap global temperature increases at 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels. That’s the threshold beyond which some scientists have said catastrophic changes could be triggered.
But the agency’s chief economist, Fatih Birol, said this week that he’s not optimistic that leaders are willing to make the necessary sacrifices.
“We are going in the wrong direction in terms of climate change,” he said in an interview Monday ahead of the report’s official release.
He noted, for instance, that governments around the world have put increasing energy efficiency at the top of their to-do lists, but efficiency has worsened for two years in a row now.
Birol said such backslides have real consequences.
“After 2017, we will lose the chance to limit the temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius,” he said.
The report said that the current promises to reduce emissions, when taken together, will likely result in an increase of more than 3.5 degrees Celsius – and there isn’t any guarantee those commitments will even be carried out. Without them, the picture is bleaker: an increase of 6 degrees Celsius or more.
Birol said the world doesn’t lack the technology to tackle the problem – just the political will.
“Even with existing technologies, you can improve substantially, but to do that, you need some price incentives and these price incentives are not there,” he said.
In fact, there are incentives to consume more: The report said subsidies for fossil fuels have risen past $400 billion. Birol said those need to be cut and instead a price needs to be levied on carbon. Only when “dirty” fuels become more expensive, he said, will governments follow through on their commitments to increase energy efficiency.
The report pushes hard the need to increase efficiency, generally considered the easiest way to reduce consumption since it has a price-incentive built in. It has become even more important since Japan’s nuclear accident sparked a rethinking of the use of atomic technology previously seen as key to cutting emissions.
“The most important contribution to reaching energy security and climate goals comes form the energy that we do not consume,” the report said.
It also predicted that oil prices would rise over the long term, though a weak global economy and the return of Libyan oil to the market would ease short-term pressures.
How high the price goes will depend, in part, on whether investors are willing to cough up what the Middle East and North Africa needs to keep pumping. Birol said last month that unrest in the region has made investors reluctant to pour money in.
6 Comments on "IEA: Time running out to limit earth’s warming"
Bernd1964 on Wed, 9th Nov 2011 11:52 pm
It is plainly wrong to postulate a simple relationship between industrial Carbon-gas emissions and mean global temperature increases because the observed changes in global temperature are part of a bigger pattern of changes in our solar system. Many other important and very clearly independent natural and astronomical statistics have changed too:
We have for example a 400-percent increase in the number of earthquakes on Earth (over 2.5 on the Richter scale) since 1973, a 500-percent increase in Earth‘s volcanic activity between 1875 and 1993, a 230-percent increase in the strength of the Sun‘s magnetic field since 1901, a 400-percent or higher increases in the speed of solar particle emissions traveling through the energy of interplanetary space, a 200-percent increase in the intensity of Jupiter‘s magnetic field from 1992-97, and many other independent earthly, planetary and solar parameters.
The answer why all this rather fast change occurs lies in the change of ambient galactic Gamma-radiation in our solar system. Our solar system has on its rotational way through our galaxy drifted into a sector of higher Gamma-ray exposure which is caused by neighbor stars and other radiating astronomical objects. This exposure to increasingly higher levels of ambient galactic radiation is the reason for the observed parametrical changes in our solar system and on Earth. We must expect that much greater changes will occur in the future. We are just at the beginning of a huge environmental change of galactic conditions for our solar system.
Yvan Dutil on Thu, 10th Nov 2011 2:58 am
Wow! This is one of the most ridiculous non fact base affirmation.
Harquebus on Thu, 10th Nov 2011 3:32 am
It will take 4000 years for Antarctica to melt. That’s how long we have before “irreversible climate change” takes hold. Fossil fuels and climate will cease to be a problem long before then.
blitzy on Thu, 10th Nov 2011 3:52 am
bozos like you 2 make me glad that the planet is dying….finally….
kiwichick on Thu, 10th Nov 2011 1:37 pm
bernd64
crap!!!
increase in co2 = warming planet
end of story
Kenz300 on Thu, 10th Nov 2011 2:25 pm
Quote — ” subsidies for fossil fuels have risen past $400 billion. Birol said those need to be cut and instead a price needs to be levied on carbon. Only when “dirty” fuels become more expensive, he said, will governments follow through on their commitments to increase energy efficiency.”
——————-
Until the people rise up and demand it they will be no political will. Corporate money is too powerful. It is time to get the corporate money out of politics.