Page added on July 21, 2011
Here’s his peak oil take:
A decade ago, the Peak Oil theory attracted a lot of adherents. It postulated that global oil production would peak in 2006, and that the following shortage would send oil prices skyrocketing. Sure enough, in 2008 a barrel of oil shot to $150. It looked like the Peak Oil theory was coming true. But less than 12 months later it dropped to under $40 a barrel. And though the price is now closer to $100 you don’t hear as much talk about Peak Oil anymore.
There are several problems with this analysis:
Who needs fuel-efficient cars?
McElroy disputes the consensus among “top executives in the auto industry” that reduced oil supplies will drive a shift toward cars that get higher MPGs. If there’s plenty of oil, who needs to worry about that?
He goes on to detail new Brazilian offshore oil discoveries, improved Iraqi oil extraction infrastructure, and the controversial process of “fracking,” suggesting that these will initiate a new oil boom. But apart from Iraq, none of this is oil that’s easy to get at.
What’s more, building more fuel-efficient cars isn’t about addressing peak oil but rather correcting a massive U.S. trade imbalance, a hugh chunk of which is due to oil imports. The economist Peter Morici has been relentless on this point for years.
Plenty of oil — for now
Peak oil doesn’t mean that the world’s oil supply will abruptly drop off a cliff, leading to massive shortages. It means that we’ll have to get used to being on the gradually descending side of the bell curve.
At the moment, there probably is plenty of oil available. And supplies may not be significantly constrained for a decade. The point is that we need to look at proven reserves as a finite resource, albeit a relatively immense one. This means that long-term conservation — through higher MPG cars, among many other innovations — is the prudent thing to pursue.
But the peak will eventually be felt
Fracking isn’t necessarily a magic bullet, either, as its environmental implications are pretty disturbing. Plenty of folks would rather pay more for gas than sacrifice the environmental equity that countries like the U.S. have built up over the past few decades.
Regardless, even if these new oil discoveries come on line, peak oil wouldn’t go away. It would just be pushed farther into the future. The bottom line is that there won’t be plenty of oil forever. So why not take action now to prepare for the era when supplies really get tight?
One Comment on "Sorry, but Fracking Doesn’t End the Peak Oil Debate"
DC on Thu, 21st Jul 2011 7:21 pm
Some amerikans seem to believe fuel-efficient cars will ‘save’ them. So they can keep wall-mart and suburbia and 50 mile daily commutes. There are of course, a few problems with this idea.
One, the corrupt fossilized US auto-industry isnt makeing anything that resembles a fuel-efficent vehicles. They have tv commericals that use the term a lot, but in amerika, a car that used to get 16MPG and now gets 18MPG(on a good day) is hailed as a rousing sucess and breakthrough.
Two, amerikan law forbids the import of a lot of foreign made high-MPG vehicles from Japan and the EU. This is done so amerika can keep pretending that 20MPG is pushing the state of art @ ford and GM, while the rest world has been driveing 40-50MPG cars for decades.
Lastly, the very idea that marginally more efficent gas-burning trash-boxes will ‘save’ them from the effects of PO, is a course a fantasy. But it sounds like something is being done about the problem(when its not). High MPG cars simply dont(and wont) exsist in numbers sufficent to make anything more than a tiny blip in consumption.
The best way to reduce gas consumption is never to use it in the first place. Bike, Walk or Demand Mass transit and increased costs for car owners to pay for it.