Page added on January 5, 2011
In this column, Paul Krugman says some wise stuff. As an applied micro economist, he starts with some facts: “Oil is back above $90 a barrel. Copper and cotton have hit record highs. Wheat and corn prices are way up. Over all, world commodity prices have risen by a quarter in the past six months.”
He offers some speculations about the causes of these price dynamics. But, the interesting part of the article is his predictions about the consequences of these events:
He writes:
“So what are the implications of the recent rise in commodity prices? It is, as I said, a sign that we’re living in a finite world, one in which resource constraints are becoming increasingly binding. This won’t bring an end to economic growth, let alone a descent into Mad Max-style collapse. It will require that we gradually change the way we live, adapting our economy and our lifestyles to the reality of more expensive resources.”
This smells like the logic presented in my Climatopolis.
In Climatopolis, I argue that the anticipated rise in fossil fuel demand in China and India will help us to adapt to climate change. If forward looking entrepreneurs anticipate that real fossil fuel prices will rise over time, then they have an incentive to find substitutes. If these substitutes are cleaner than fossil fuels (i.e renewables) then we can achieve the win-win of economic growth without exacerbating GHG concentrations in the atmosphere. In this sense; the belief in “Peak Oil” helps us to simultaneously mitigate and adapt to climate change.
Note that Krugman predicts a gradual adjustment of society to our new realities. He is taking a gentle slap at those who believe that we can fall off a cliff over night.
4 Comments on "Oil prices rise. We adapt. (So don’t panic.)"
Kenz300 on Wed, 5th Jan 2011 12:08 am
The transition to a sustainable economy needs to begin in earnest.
Wind, solar, geothermal and second generation biofuels all need to become a bigger part of the energy mix.
Bring on the electric, flex-fuel and hybrid vehicles.
Our economic security and national security will depend on our ability to move to a more sustainable energy mix.
Bloomer on Wed, 5th Jan 2011 3:09 pm
What if the alternatives are coal, tar sands, heavy oil and nuclear energy. Could be a lose-lose.
DC on Wed, 5th Jan 2011 6:36 pm
Unfortunately, the only ‘alternatives’ being talked about, are in fact, coal, tar-sands, and nuclear. How can energy descent be slow-and-gradual? Did he learn nothing from the last near-economic melt-down caused by 150 dollar a barrel oil? Does he really believe the next run-up in oil prices somehow wont be just as damageing to the endless-growth, endless waste economic model? Strange..
Ian Cooper on Thu, 6th Jan 2011 5:33 am
I wouldn’t call the greatest recession since the Great Depression ‘adapting’, unless it’s the kind of adaptation that a cow makes as it’s being turned into a beefburger.