Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on November 16, 2010

Bookmark and Share

More economists thinking about Peak Oil

Business

I’m sure I haven’t yet come to grips with the views expressed by commenters on my last post about economics and peak oil, but here is another paper on economics, Hubbert’s Peak, and peak oil.  In short the authors  model resource extraction scenarios in the manner that economists sometimes do, and conclude that the timing of the peak production will be determined by “above the ground” factors such as cost of production, oil prices and political constraints on access to resources rather than “below the ground” geological factors.

Note that the economist views I’ve cited from time to time – from CERA/Yergin to James Smith and now Pierre-Noël Giraud at CERNA and colleagues from EDF-R&D in France – are not denying that petroleum is an exhaustible resource nor that production will peak.  But, and speaking just for myself now, I am denying that the date of the peak is particularly significant and that sometime shortly after the peak we will face any kind of significant social strife, economic collapse, or other major drama. I’m stuck in a “business as usual” pose, because I expect business as usual.

More specifically, I expect over time petroleum will become expensive relative to other energy sources, and we will substitute away from petroleum and toward alternatives as that happens.  Of course it is already true in niches – there is a reason we don’t have kerosene lamps in our homes anymore and remote flashing roadside signs are solar powered – and the niches will grow as alternatives begin to make more sense.  Eventually, petroleum will become the niche fuel in an energy economy mostly running on other sources.  I don’t expect the social trauma associated with this transition to be any more wrenching than the shift from wood to coal or coal to oil.

If you think I am wrong, I’m willing to be educated.  But note that it will take quite of bit of educating to get me to drop economist habits of thought, so the simpler way to convert me to another way of thinking about peak oil is to point to an analysis with a reasonable economic foundation. I encourage commenters to direct me to their favorite such analysis.

NOTE: Here is the authors’ abstract for the paper, “Hubbert’s Oil Peak Revisited by a Simulation Model“:

As conventional oil reserves are declining, the debate on the oil production peak has become a burning issue. An increasing number of papers refer to Hubbert’s peak oil theory to forecast the date of the production peak, both at regional and world levels. However, in our views, this theory lacks microeconomic foundations. Notably, it does not assume that exploration and production decisions in the oil industry depend on market prices. In an attempt to overcome these shortcomings, we have built an adaptative model, accounting for the behavior of one agent, standing for the competitive exploration-production industry, subjected to incomplete but improving information on the remaining reserves.

Our work yields challenging results on the reasons for an Hubbert type peak oil, lying mainly “above the ground”, both at regional and world levels, and on the shape of the production and marginal cost trajectories.

Energy Collective



2 Comments on "More economists thinking about Peak Oil"

  1. KenZ300 on Tue, 16th Nov 2010 9:55 am 

    The economic consequences of high oil prices were seen in 2008 when oil went to $147 / barrel.

    Family budgets were stretched to the limit when more of the budget went to transportation fuel and little remained to pay the mortgage.

  2. John Clarkson on Tue, 16th Nov 2010 6:28 pm 

    Economists are really think like the leaders of highly intelligent but low imagination bacteria in a bottle of resources. If the bacteria use up the resources as the grow in numbers, doubling in number every minute, consuming the bottle exponentially every minute 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and so on…how long if we know it takes just 1 hour to use up the resources, ie. to fill the bottle with bacteria, will it take to use up half of it? Well, it’s 59 minutes because the next minute they’ve doubled up to fill the bottle. Discover 3 more bottles and they’ve until another 2 minutes to them up! Oil won’t suddenly run out like this, but eventually it will be rationed. Using the BP figures at 1% per year consumption we’ve got until 2046. That’s not far away for fuel rationing.

    Substitutes will not work. There is no economic subsitute for kerosene. Bio fuels are far too damaging to food production, and simply not viable. The whole of Europe growing biofuels would only make a tiny percentage of our current global oil use. Iowan farmers use oil with the equivalent energy of Hiroshima bombs each year just in grain production. Once oil is rationed, coal will become too expensive to mine, as oil is used to mine it. Gas will be in a similar pickle. A world without oil is one of mass starvation, population decline, war over resources, disease and ultimately the demolishing of class structures and elites. Starving people care nothing about their leaders as the French Revolution proves.

    Economists make me laugh when they speak of market prices, adaptive models, and incomplete data. They are laughable because they lack imagination. Their training is similar to the political elites of pre-1914. All of them believed that modern wars would be short, bloodless conflicts, over by Christmas. Well, the world isn’t like a model, we are not spiritual beings, just meat on legs, with blood, and a need for food and water. Our imagination is limited by our evolution: survival for a hunter-gatherer was a relatively short-term issue: find the food and shelter and survive.

    The end of oil will also end the problem of climate change. Necessity is the mother of invention but it also has its limits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *