Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on July 13, 2010

Bookmark and Share

Electric Cars Won’t Strain the Power Grid

Consumption

Will electric vehicles bring down the U.S. power grid?

The answer, equally bluntly, is: No. They won’t.

(And we rather wish that certain news organizations–we’re talkin’ to you, The New York Times–could add a bit more perspective before writing about the topic in the predictable maybe-yes-but-maybe-no format.)

Study by unlikely partners

A comprehensive and wide-ranging two-volume study from 2007, Environmental Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles, looked at the impact of plug-in vehicles on the U.S. electrical grid. It also analyzed the “wells-to-wheels” carbon emissions of plug-ins versus gasoline cars.

The study is well regarded, in part because of its authors. It was a joint effort by two somewhat unlikely partners: the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), which is the utility industry’s research arm, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

It looks at the consequences of drivers charging plug-in vehicles at different times during the day. And it assumes a gradual rollout of electric vehicles into the current U.S. fleet of 300 million vehicles. GM, for example, will only sell 10,000 Chevy Volts during all of 2011.

1 EV = 4 plasma TVs

In practice, this means electric cars will only impose marginal increases on the electric grid. The load of one plug-in recharging (about 2 kilowatts) is roughly the same as that of four or five plasma television sets. Plasma TVs hardly brought worries about grid crashes.

Auto analyst J.D. Power projects that by 2015, global production of plug-in electric vehicles–for all markets, not just the U.S.–will total 500,000 per year, half in China. If they all charged at the same time, that’s no more than the load of 2 million plasma TV sets, globally.

Even if the U.S. alone has half a million plug-ins to recharge (out of 300 million vehicles on the road, remember) within a few years, utility executives aren’t losing any sleep. In fact, they’re happy. They love the idea of selling you “fuel” for your vehicle.

Off-peak charging incentives

They will, however, offer strong incentives to get you to charge overnight, when demand on their generating capacity plummets. They have tons of unused power capacity then, and they’d like nothing better than to sell you some of that power, even at special cheap rates.

Even before “smart grid” applications arrive, owners will be able to direct their electric cars when to recharge. The driver of a 2011 Volt, for example, can plug it in as soon as she returns from work, but set the car to charge only when cheaper nighttime rates kick in–after 11 pm, say.

Knowing all this, the EPRI-NRDC study concluded–not surprisingly–that plug-in vehicles won’t strain the grid. Two earlier, more limited studies from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory concluded essentially the same thing.

‘Prius clusters’ a worry

A more realistic worry for utility executives is that early adopters who buy plug-in vehicles will live in concentrated groups, informally known as “Prius clusters” (more than half the buyers who’ve put down deposits on the 2011 Nissan Leaf now own Toyota Prius hybrids).

The result is that neighborhood transformers may have to be upgraded if, for example, two or three homes on a particular cul-de-sac install EV chargers.

Upgrading local distribution equipment is a manageable problem, one that utilities plan for all the time as household electric usage inches up due to new consumer electronics and other equipment.

Knowing where it may occur is key, which is why utilities are working hard asking likely EV buyers to raise their hands ahead of time.

But in short, the extra load on the grid from charging upcoming plug-in cars will be relatively slow to grow, predictable, and highly localized in its early years. Electric vehicles will not “bring down the grid” under any circumstances.

GreenCarReports



3 Comments on "Electric Cars Won’t Strain the Power Grid"

  1. KenZ300 on Tue, 13th Jul 2010 9:55 pm 

    Upgrading the grid to a SMART GRID will provide consumers and utilities with the power and knowledge to adjust consumption levels to non peak periods.

    Using more distributed power generation and adding solar panels, small wind generators and solar heaters will help. As prices for solar and wind installation come down more home owners and businesses will begin to install them.

    Walmart is already testing the installation of small wind generators for it’s stores.

  2. Jerry McManus on Wed, 14th Jul 2010 12:14 am 

    Plasma TV’s are notorious energy hogs, so that particular comparison hardly inspires confidence in the authors grip on reality.

    Nevertheless, despite our suspicions that anyone who can equate the words “green” and “car” is clearly not the brightest bulb, we can poke our heads into that bizzarro world just long enough to see that, using the authors own numbers, replacing the auto fleet in the U.S. alone with EV’s would require plugging in something on the order of ONE BILLION plasma TV’s and that would most assuredly crash the grid under any circumstances.

    More disturbing to me, however, is the flippant dismissal of so-called “off peak” power generation as a mere trifle. Oh, yes, simply brilliant, do let us run hundreds if not thousands of coal fired power plants both day AND night. What could possibly go wrong?

    I’m reminded of a recent animated commercial (in fact, I think it was BP) in which we see a group of infants driving in a car, acting for all the world like your average young, wired, hipsters complete with cell phones and mp3 players. They literally spit out their pacifiers in joy at the sight of a gas station which, unlike the dark, dirty, scary stations they turned their cute-as-button noses up at earlier, is spewing green and yellow flowers out of the gas pumps.

    Painting a bright shiny picture of young hipsters buzzing around a perfect world in their “bright green” EV’s is no less specious, and every bit as nauseating.

    Cheers,
    Jerry

  3. DMyers on Wed, 14th Jul 2010 8:45 am 

    Very well said, Jerry. I’d like to elaborate on the plasma TV. This is a specious argument if we’ve ever seen one. The argument is, plugging in a car doesn’t use that much more energy than a few plasma TVs, and no one ever complained about those using too much power when they came out, so plugging in cars will not strain the grid. Whoa!

    The subliminal suggestion in this argument is that plugging in autos will really only replace that same use by plasma TVs. If you only use the same power quantity as some other utility, then your use of the power is not cumulative but a replacement and not an addition. That has to be, or the essential conclusion would have to be that we are already consuming power by plasma TVs, and the plugging in of cars will then add to and duplicate that. Therefore, the plugging in of cars probably will strain the power grid.

    Another point of interest, the lack of emphasis on saving energy is screamingly obvious. The general flow of this piece follows the old “electric cars would help us wean ourselves off imported oil” concept. This does not involve saving energy but is, instead, a politically expedient reallocation of source from oil to coal. These plug ins consume energy at “off-peak” hours. God forbid that we should save the coal used to produce that off-peak power.

    My own notion that plugging in electric cars very definitely will strain the grid did not lose any ground from reading this article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *