Page added on September 1, 2009
by Steve Andrews and Randy Udall
Last week Michael Lynch and Daniel Yergin pummeled the concept of peak oil in two mainstream media outlets. Lynch’s feisty but nearly fact-free op-ed for the New York Times and Yergin’s more scholarly reflection in Foreign Policy whipped up further discussion in the blogosphere. Although the majority of on-line responses to Lynch’s piece were negative, peak oil advocates were put on the defensive.
The two critics employ distinctly different separate styles
Yergin’s case is somewhat perplexing. His shop (Cambridge Energy Research Associates
Leave a Reply